Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to reward Palestinian terrorists could cost Britain two trillion pounds.
It’s reported that Palestine might seek £2trillion in reparations because it’s possible the new country would ask for compensation for land ‘taken from the Palestinian people’ when Britain relinquished control of the region after the Second World War.
Patrick Christys lashed out at Sir Keir Starmer
|
GB NEWS
A senior Hamas official declared Starmer’s decision was ‘a victory’.
This is the same terrorist group that only a few months ago executed people in the street while loads of people watched and filmed it on their phones.
Sir Keir Starmer decided not to impose any conditions on Palestine having to return the hostages, and David Lammy even admitted yesterday that it will not bring us any closer to a ceasefire and get this – David Lammy has banged on about colonialism relentlessly throughout his political career and now Labour’s position is to officially recognise a state, then tell that state they have to get rid of their government and appoint one we approve of!
What does that sound like?
Remember the Gazan students we were letting come to Britain to study, and how they couldn’t bring their families…yeh, well now it looks like Labour may consider letting them bring their partners and kids with them. Brilliant.
Labour have no idea what they’re doing, here’s little Hamish Falconer, a Foreign Office Minister, basically admitting the whole thing is a load of guff.
Hamas refuses to disarm and will only surrender weapons once an autonomous Palestinian nation exists with Jerusalem serving as its capital | REUTERS
He was on GB News saying he didn’t know if there’d be a Palestinian Embassy in London…which is odd, because just a couple of hours later here he is standing gormlessly next to the bloke opening a Palestinian embassy in London.
Nearly 90 per cent of people disagree with Labour’s decision to reward terrorists and recognise a Palestinian state with conditions.
We all know Sir Keir Starmer loves a bit of international law. We had to surrender the Chagos Islands because of international law. We can’t stop the migrant crisis because of international law.
Yeh, well some lawyers have speculated that recognising a Palestinian state is against international law, because it doesn’t have clearly defined borders, but he’s alright to ignore the law there.
Why? Why have Labour done it? Well…we all know, don’t we:
Ah yes… Sir Keir Starmer, a man regarded by many as the worst Prime Minister in British history, has rewarded an Islamist terror group because he wants to try to keep the hard-left and the Muslim community happy – that’s my view, anyway.
So to recap – Labour’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state could cost us £2trillion, not bring any hostages home, not lead to a ceasefire, might break international law and was celebrated by an Islamist terror group.
