Featured

Margaret Thatcher likened to Adolf Hitler and Donald Trump labelled ‘terrorist leader’ at University of Leicester

Margaret Thatcher has been likened to Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Putin at a UK university.

In a “principles of management” lecture at the University of Leicester, business students were told that the trailblazer Prime Minister shared the same leadership style as the pair of dictators.


Elsewhere, images from a presentation see Donald Trump and Elon Musk branded “terrorist leaders” – in the same category as Osama Bin Laden, mass murderer Elliot Rodger, and again President Putin.

“The terrorist leader engages in unlawful threats, violence or bullying to inculcate fear intended to coerce or intimidate followers and opponents into submission,” a slide says.

The supposed “terrorists” are also compared to Marvel comic book supervillain Erik Killmonger.

Students are told how Baroness Thatcher was “autocratic” under the philosophy of 20th-century psychologist Kurt Lewin.

Lewin defined “autocratic” to mean staying out of work decisions unless asked, steering clear of assigning tasks, and only rarely giving praise.

This, a university presentation said, brought her into the same bracket as Hitler and Mr Putin – as well as military commanders and factory supervisors.

Just last year, the former Prime Minister was characterised as a “contemporary villain” alongside – again – Hitler and Bin Laden by London’s V&A Museum.

Thatcher/Hitler/Trump/Bin Lade/University lecture slide

Margaret Thatcher was likened to Adolf Hitler and Vladimir Putin at a University of Leicester lecture – while Donald Trump was put in the same category as Osama Bin Laden

|

PA/GETTY/X/BENSUTER

Responding to the lecture, former Conservative Education Secretary Sir Gavin Williamson told GB News: “It is completely out of order and a shocking comparison.

“Margaret Thatcher has been one of our greatest leaders and it is shocking that this lecturer has said this and should immediately withdraw the remarks and apologise.”

Meanwhile, a Tory source added: “As if Labour destroying the graduate job market wasn’t enough, students have to cope with woke tutors teaching them total, shameful rubbish.

“That Margaret Thatcher, who fought for freedom across Europe, should be compared to a mass-murdering dictator is just crassly offensive.”

MORE FROM BRITAIN’S UNIVERSITIES:

\u200bDonald Trump and Vladimir Putin

Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin were placed in the same ‘terrorist leader’ category

|

REUTERS

Just last month, a report from the same university labelled the British countryside “overwhelmingly white” and slated it for not having enough halal food options.

A review on “rural racism” from Leicester’s “Centre for Hate Studies” laid into various “challenges” faced by those from ethnic minority backgrounds in the countryside.

While in 2022, the university was forced to vow it “does not condone any form of defacement” after one of its staff hurled an egg at a 20-foot bronze statue of Mrs Thatcher in Grantham – for which he was later fined £90.

Earlier this year, Professor Dennis Hayes, the director of free speech campaign group Academics For Academic Freedom, issued a dire warning about the state of Britain’s higher education sector.

University lecture slides

IN PICTURES: The lecture materials which have sparked calls for the university sector to be ‘ripped down and rebuilt’

|

X/BENSUTER

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 81