<![CDATA[Democrat Party]]><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]><![CDATA[January 6]]><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]>Featured

Pelosi Goes Berserk When Cornered With Questions From Reporter About Jan. 6 – RedState

admin
October 15, 2025
0Points
0
0
Pelosi Goes Berserk When Cornered With Questions From Reporter About Jan. 6 – RedState

It seems like former Speaker of the House, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), is very sensitive when it comes to people questioning her about what happened at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th, 2021.





Pelosi proved that in spades when a reporter for LindellTV, Alison Steinberg, asked her if she was concerned that the new January 6th committee would “find her liable for that day.” “Why did you refuse the National Guard on Jan. 6?” Steinberg asked. That’s when Pelosi went berserk. 

Pelosi snapped at Steinberg, stabbing her finger at her and ranting, “Shut up! I did NOT refuse the National Guard – the president didn’t send it. Why are you coming here with Republican talking points as though you’re a serious journalist?”

The reporter said, “The American people want to know. We still have questions.” 

But Pelosi huffed off, leaning on a man’s arm for assistance, not offering any further answer to the question. 

Looks like Pelosi isn’t able to control her emotions anymore. Screaming at a reporter is not a good look, and it tends to make people ask what she’s hiding. The reporter smiled at the end as she turned around, realizing she had something good. 





LindellTV then posted a replay of Pelosi’s comments on the matter on Jan. 6. 

“I take responsibility for not having them just prepare for war,” she said at the time.

President Trump had inquired before Jan. 6 and offered the National Guard. But the Capitol Police turned it down, as former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund has said, because they didn’t have approval from the Sergeants-at-Arms because of “optics.” The then-House Sergeant at Arms, Paul Irving, answered to Pelosi. 

Sund said his request wasn’t approved for more than an hour on Jan. 6 as the action was happening at the Capitol. 

READ MORE: Former Capitol Police Chief Wrecks Pelosi for Her Remarks About LA Riots and Jan. 6

Sund posted on X in response to Pelosi’s freakout, laying out the timeline:

Ma’am, let me help refresh your memory. It was your Sergeant at Arms (SAA) who repeatedly denied my multiple requests for National Guard assistance before and on January 6. Even on Jan 6, your Sergeant at Arms denied my urgent requests for over 70 minutes, while he was “running it up the chain” for your approval.

The Pentagon offered National Guard assistance, but I had to decline because your SAA would not grant me the legal authority as required under federal law (2 U.S.C. §1970).





As Steinberg noted, there is a new Jan. 6 committee looking into things. Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) is heading it up.

Perhaps that’s why Pelosi is a bit nervous. 


Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.





Source link

admin

Related Posts

Featured
9

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

by admin
October 8, 2025

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 97

TRENDING

Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .