FeaturedUK

Police seize firearms from home of arrested Oxford student | UK | News

Firearms and ammunition have allegedly been seized at the home of an Oxford University student who was arrested for anti-Israel protesting. Officers raided the home of Sam Williams in a cul-de-sac in Pembury, Tunbridge Wells, followed by a forensic officer on Thursday, according to reports. Photos from the scene obtained by the Daily Mail appeared to show an officer carrying clear plastic bags of shotgun cartridges, rifles and shotguns from the property.

One neighbour told the newspaper: “It’s a bit worrying there were shotguns and ammunition in the house. They may be legally owned [but] we didn’t know they went hunting. Obviously the police have got a job to do, but as far as we’re concerned, it adds a layer of extra worry to it all.”

There is no suggestion the guns are not legally owned.

Williams was reportedly suspended from Oxford University shortly after his arrest for leading an antisemitic chant at a pro-Palestine protest in central London last week.

The 20-year-old undergraduate student was studying Politics, Philosophy and Economics at Balliol College before he was detained on suspicion of inciting racial hatred after the video was widely shared on social media.

Footage from the rally last weekend showed Williams leading the assembled crowd in a chant of: “Gaza, Gaza make us proud, put the Zios in the ground”. ‘Zio’ is a derogatory term for Zionists and Jewish people.

He was also caught on camera holding a banner reading: “Oxford University pick a side, justice or genocide.”

The Metropolitan Police said in a statement on Wednesday: “Officers investigating chants filmed at a Palestine Coalition Demonstration in central London on Saturday, October 11, have made an arrest.

“A 20-year-old man was arrested at an address in Oxfordshire on Wednesday, October 15, on suspicion of inciting racial hatred. He remains in police custody.”

A statement from Oxford University added: “While the university cannot comment on individual student cases, it has the power to take immediate and proportionate action including, as appropriate, suspending a student from membership of the university, whenever serious concerns are raised.

“Oxford University is unequivocal: there is no place for hatred, anti-semitism or discrimination within our community, and we will always act to protect the safety and dignity of our students.”

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 99