Featured

Politics news: Nigel Farage vows

Nigel Farage has revealed he would shoot down Russian drones if he were elected Prime Minister in what marks the Reform UK leader’s strongest remarks on Russia.

The comments come after he came under cross-party fire, accusing him of being soft on Russian President Vladimir Putin who he admitted was a “very bad dude”.


“I was really hoping that Trump would bring Putin to heel,” Mr Farage told Bloomberg.

“That some kind of compromise could be struck, as it’s just been recently struck with Gaza and Israel. Clearly, that is not going to happen.”

The Reform leader also said Britain would use frozen Russian assets to help aid Ukraine, saying “if they’re there through illegal means, they should be”.

When asked what he would do about Russian jets travelling into Nato territory, Mr Farage said: “Gotta shoot them down”.

However, Mr Farage fell short of committing to putting British troops on the ground in Ukraine if there was a ceasefire, adding: “I’d be very cautious about doing that” and instead he could throw his support behind a putting a “UN force”, comparing the approach to Korea.

The Reform leader said he expects “the Americans beginning to deliver Tomahawk missiles to Kyiv”.

“I think Trump feels that Putin has made a fool of him. Clearly, Putin is not a rational man,” Mr Farage said.

FOLLOW BELOW FOR LIVE UPDATES THROUGHOUT THE DAY…

Home Secretary now urged to SACK West Midlands Police chief for ‘failing to protect Jews’

Shabana Mahmood has been urged to sack West Midlands Police’s Chief Constable for “failing to guarantee the safety of Jews” in Birmingham.

It emerged on Thursday that fans of Israeli team Maccabi Tel Aviv would be barred from their fixture against Aston Villa on November 6.

A mass outcry then followed, with Sir Keir Starmer, Israel’s Foreign Minister, and the leaders of Reform UK, the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats all condemning the move.

READ THE FULL STORY

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 82