<![CDATA[Alaska]]><![CDATA[Government Shutdown]]><![CDATA[Kristi Noem]]><![CDATA[TSA]]>Featured

TSA Shutdown Ad to Be Shown in Alaska Airports – RedState

Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem’s recorded TSA message, which lays the blame for the ongoing Schumer shutdown squarely on Democrats (which is, in all candor, where it belongs), has been the hot topic de jour among airport management in the last few days. The message itself is pretty simple: There may be delays, we’re doing all we can to keep you moving, and thanks, Democrats.





Plenty of airports are refusing to show the video. Anchorage, Alaska, isn’t one of them, nor is Fairbanks. At Alaska’s two largest airports, the Secretary’s image will appear at the TSA checkpoint, message intact.

Passengers at Alaska’s biggest airports may soon see a political advertisement published by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that blames Democrats for the ongoing federal government shutdown.

The video, promoted by the White House, features Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and is expected to appear at Transportation Security Administration checkpoints.

These Alaska airports are owned and operated by the state. In fact, most of Alaska’s 230+ airports are state-operated, with one key exception.

Airport officials in other states — including Noem’s home state of South Dakota — have declined to allow the video, citing longstanding policies against airing political content.

In Alaska, the state department of transportation and public facilities owns and operates more than 230 airports statewide, including Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport and Fairbanks International Airport.

That exception? The state capital, Juneau, has the Great Land’s third-largest airport. The management of Juneau International Airport has been, as of this writing, non-committal.





Only a handful of Alaska’s airports aren’t owned and operated by the state. One notable exception is Juneau International Airport, the state’s third-largest.

There, airport manager Andres Delgado said that he had received an email from a TSA official providing advance notice but hadn’t yet received an official request.

He said he wanted to check with the city manager and legal counsel before deciding whether to allow the video.

“We’ve been, understandably, trying to avoid taking a stance on it,” he said.

Someone has decided that Juneau is going to try to finesse this – for now, at least. Maybe they’re hoping the situation will resolve itself before they have to decide what to do.


Read More: Now It’s the ‘Airport Resistance’: Multiple Facilities Refuse to Air Kristi Noem’s Schumer Shutdown Video

Watch: Sec. Noem Brings the Facts Straight to the American People on Airport Delays, Schumer Shutdown


Alaska’s state department of transportation, which manages the state-run airports, has only been approached by TSA over Anchorage and Juneau, which is to be expected; the majority of Alaska’s airports are in rural areas and are primarily used for civil aviation. The smaller airports don’t even have any means to display this video, although Anchorage and Fairbanks do have screens in the areas leased by TSA. 





The Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act states in part that state officials may not use their position to: “…use or authorize the use of state funds, facilities, equipment, services, or another government asset or resource for partisan political purposes,” and Secretary Noem’s jab at Congressional Democrats may be seen as such a partisan political use. That law isn’t being applied here, perhaps because the screens in question are in the area leased by, and under the control of, TSA.


Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.



Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 97