Featured

Prince Andrew ‘exchanged volumes of emails’ with Jeffrey Epstein in ‘hectic traffic’ of messages

admin
October 18, 2025
0Points
0
1
Prince Andrew 'exchanged volumes of emails' with Jeffrey Epstein in 'hectic traffic' of messages

Prince Andrew exchanged “volumes” of emails with Jeffrey Epstein, the jounalist who revealed the “We are in this together” message between the pair has claimed.

Daphne Barak, speaking on GB News’ flagship US programme, The Late Show Live, said there had been “hectic traffic” between the pair – as well as the ex-duke’s ex-wife Sarah Ferguson.

Ms Barak told host Bev Turner: “I have to tell you, I am sharing with you that there was a volume of emails between them.

“There were not one or two or three. There are volumes of emails between them there. It was very hectic traffic.”

Prince Andrew and Jeffrey EpsteinPICTURED: Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein, photographed together in 2000 | GETTY

She also claimed that the trio’s relationship was “much more tight” than it has appeared so far – which has already seen the disgraced prince resign his ducal titles.

Barak also exclusively told the People’s Channel that there were “more things coming next” – but cryptically added they would not be “what people expect”.

The renowned journalist elsewhere claimed that her friend Sarah Ferguson “complained” and asked for certain details not to be printed.

However, Ms Barak said she informed the former duchess she would “not do her dirty laundry”.

The emails show Fergie worrying about her “relationships with children’s charities” as the Andrew-Epstein scandal unfolded.

Prince Andrew’s statement on Friday evening read: “In discussion with the King, and my immediate and wider family, we have concluded the continued accusations about me distract from the work of His Majesty and the Royal Family.

“I have decided, as I always have, to put my duty to my family and country first. I stand by my decision five years ago to stand back from public life.

“With His Majesty’s agreement, we feel I must now go a step further. I will therefore no longer use my title or the honours which have been conferred upon me.

“As I have said previously, I vigorously deny the accusations against me,” he added.

The prince has strenously denied all claims against him, and came to an out-of-court settlement with accuser Virginia Giuffre three years ago – which contained no admission of liability, no apology.

Source link

admin

Related Posts

Featured
9

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

by admin
October 8, 2025

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 83
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .