<![CDATA[Bluesky]]><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]><![CDATA[Government Shutdown]]><![CDATA[Trump Administration]]><![CDATA[White House]]>Featured

Trump Administration’s Splashy Entrance to Liberal Heartland Bluesky Imitates Sherman’s March to the Sea – RedState

The Trump administration officially invaded enemy territory Friday with the White House and many cabinet agencies opening social media accounts on the liberal hellhole that is Bluesky. Bluesky is very similar to X and Truth Social in appearance and functionality. The difference is that expressing anything but the most left-wing of positions gets you booted. When Elon Musk took over Twitter and began gutting the liberal infrastructure, leftists fled to Bluesky so they could engage in uninterrupted onanism.





The Leninist-Trotskyite discipline at Bluesky is so tightly enforced that sometimes leftists get banned for being insufficiently Marxist. Here, a senior writer for Politico was banned for apparently linking to a Politico article.

The safe space must’ve thought I was too dangerous.

“A Bluesky account you control,” read the unexpected message in my inbox the other day from the Bluesky Moderation Team, “has been detected by our systems as being spammy, fake, or inauthentic. … As a result, your account has been taken down. As a reminder, Bluesky requires that users not use Bluesky to do harm to others, including spamming, scamming, phishing or otherwise disrupting the Bluesky experience for other users. If you have any additional questions or wish to appeal this decision, please reply to this email.”

Friday, all of that changed. President Trump led the charge with a video titled “Daddy’s Home.”

Most probably aren’t old enough to catch the reference, but the riff from Norman Greenbaum’s monster 1969 hit, “Spirit in the Sky,” that starts at 0:19 is classic trolling within a troll.

Homeland Security also contributed a video.





In short order, the rest of the troops were aboard.

Yes, there was some trolling.

The natives were unhappy.

It remains to be seen whether Bluesky’s management will allow the United States government to use its platform.

While funny, this is anything but trivial. Taking the administration’s message into the enemy’s heartland…ooops, why, yes, I did refer to the left as our enemies and not merely misguided fellow citizens…shows the White House thinks it is winning. Polling indicates the same number of Americans blame the White House as the Democrats for the shutdown. That is a major change, due in part to the White House’s aggressive pushback against Democrat lines of attack. As I noted last week, during JD Vance’s interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, not a single question was asked about the shutdown; see JD Vance Cooks George Stephanopoulos for Refusing to Talk About the Schumer Shutdown – RedState.





Polling also shows most Americans are in favor of Trump’s immigration crackdown, even if they might be queasy about the method. A supermajority is in favor of killing drug traffickers. Now that it is out of favor, no one supports DEI. Redistricting could very well gut the House Democrat caucus for a couple of generations. In short, we are at that place in battle where the other guy is about to throw down his rifle and decide he has urgent business elsewhere.

What you’re seeing here is the social media equivalent of Sherman’s March to the Sea. This is the administration cutting, burning, and looting a rhetorical path across the enemy’s hinterlands; something the enemy had never anticipated.

Bluesky can either allow this to happen or it can ban the U.S. government and face the consequences.


The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this. Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.





Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 82