Archbishop of ViennaCatholicCatholic ChurchCelibacyFeaturedFemale OrdinationHeterodoxJosef GrünwidlPope Leo XIVSynodalityVatican

Pope Leo appoints priest who expressed support for ‘women’s ordination’ as archbishop of Vienna


VIENNA (LifeSiteNews) — Pope Leo XIV has officially appointed modernist Msgr. Josef Grünwidl as new archbishop of Vienna.

In an October 17 publication from the press office of the Holy See, the Vatican announced Pope Leo XIV”s appointment of 63-year-old Josef Grünwidl, known for his heterodox activism, as archbishop of Vienna.

“The Holy Father has appointed the Reverend Josef Grünwidl, until now apostolic administrator of the same archdiocese, as metropolitan archbishop of Wien, Austria,” the announcement read.

LifeSiteNews’ John-Henry Westen responded to the appointment, voicing concern over Grünwidl’s modernist positions which contradict centuries of Catholic doctrine.

“It’s official: Pope Leo has appointed an ultra-liberal who pushed women’s ordination and communion for non-Catholics as the Archbishop of Vienna Austria,” Westen posted on X. During his time as a priest, Grünwidl has become known for his modernist stances, which includes encouragement of “female ordination” and attempts to decentralize authority within the Church as part of the leftist push for “synodality.”

He has publicly called for an “urgent need for clarification” on the “ordination” of women, specifically supporting further discussion and potential implementation of a “female diaconate.” He has also expressed openness to admitting women to the College of Cardinals and has appointed three women to the diocesan leadership team in Vienna.

Furthermore, the ORF reports that Grünwidl belonged to a heterodox group titled “Call to Disobedience” that openly pushed for “ordaining” women and married men as priests and giving Holy Communion to the divorced and “remarried” and non-Catholics, among other things, through a flagrant “call to disobedience.”

Grünwidl’s activism is in direct contradiction to the teachings of the Catholic Church, which reserves the vocation of priesthood to “baptized men.” The Catechism of the Catholic Church explains that the Church is bound by Christ’s decision to ordain men to the priesthood and “for this reason the ordination of women is not possible.”

In another dissent from Church teaching, Grünwidl has previously stated that while he chose to remain celibate as a priest, the practice is “not a matter of faith” and should be left to the discretion of individual clergy.

At the same time, the Catechism clearly states that “all the ordained ministers of the Latin Church, with the exception of permanent deacons, are normally chosen from among men of faith who live a celibate life and who intend to remain celibate ‘for the sake of the kingdom of heaven’ and to devote themselves entirely to the service of God and the service of others.”


Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 83