Featured

Gogoa Lois Tape set to receive thousands in benefits despite being behind bars after strangling girlfriend Kennedi Westcarr-Sabaroche

A convicted killer is set to receive thousands of pounds in benefits despite strangling his girlfriend and driving around for hours with her body in the car.

Gogoa Lois Tape killed Kennedi Westcarr-Sabaroche in April 2024, however, he was convicted of manslaughter rather than murder after he claimed diminished responsibility for the crime due to his mental health which prosecutors said was worsened due to his heavy use of cannabis.


Rather than facing prison, Tape was sent to a secure psychiatric unit and, as such, remains eligible to receive £400 a month in universal credit payments.

Although prisoners are barred from receiving state benefits, the majority of convicted criminals placed in secure psychiatric hospitals remain eligible as they are treated as patients rather than prisoners.

On Monday, family members of Ms Westcarr-Sabaroche, including mother, Linda, and uncle, Leon, will meet with Pat McFadden, the Work and Pensions Secretary, to discuss closing this loophole.

A spokesman for Mr McFadden told The Telegraph: “The Secretary of State has asked officials to urgently look at how we can stop benefit entitlement for offenders who are detained in psychiatric hospitals.”

Mr Westcarr said Tape “effectively got away with murder” despite killing her in “the most brutal way imaginable”.

He said: “As he has no living costs while hospitalised, this means that over the course of three or four years, he could accumulate a significant amount of taxpayers’ money – all while under a hospital order for taking an innocent life.”

Gogoa Lois Tape

Gogoa Lois Tape was convicted of manslaughter rather than murder after claiming diminished responsibility due to his mental health

|

PA

Mr Westcarr added: “By contrast, my sister, who lost her daughter in this horrific way, has had to become the sole carer for her granddaughter.

“She has had to fight at every step for even the most basic financial support from the Government and local authorities.

“The injustice of the situation is staggering.

“How can it be right that a convicted killer can receive benefits and potentially leave hospital with a lump sum of money, while the victim’s family is left struggling to survive – emotionally and financially? This cannot be acceptable in any just or moral society.”

​​​BENEFITS IN BRITAIN – READ MORE: 

Kennedi Westcarr-Sabaroche

Kennedi Westcarr-Sabaroche had previously decided to break up with Tape

|

PA

According to Government statistics, 2,745 offenders held under the Mental Health Act, including killers and rapists, are currently eligible to claim benefits.

Tape lured Ms Westcarr-Sabaroche, who had decided to break up with him, to meet by asking for a lift to a “plumbing job”.

He then strangled her to death in her car outside his home as the couple’s one-year-old daughter slept inside.

Tape transferred her body to the passenger seat and then drove around for nearly two hours with her body beside him, bought cigarettes and used her phone to send a message to her friend.

Linda Westcarr

Linda Westcarr and other members of Ms Westcarr-Sabaroche’s family are set to meet with Pat McFadden to discuss closing the loophole in the benfits system

|

PA

Some six-and-a-half hours after the killing, he confessed what he had done to his brother.

Tape was handed a hospital order by Judge Freya Newbery under Section 37 of the Mental Health Act, and was also given a restriction order under Section 41 allowing for his indefinite detention.

She said that at the time of the attack, Tape was an “undiagnosed schizophrenic” who held “paranoid and persecutory delusions”, which “substantially impaired” his judgement and self-control.

The court was told that Tape had smoked cannabis since 2014 and in 2023 had contact with mental health services and was “warned to abstain, but would smoke cannabis afterwards”.

Mr Westcarr said: “As a grieving family, we feel utterly devastated and let down by the criminal justice system.

“The way in which the court proceedings were conducted has left us with the painful belief that the man who killed my niece has effectively got away with murder.

“He killed her in the most brutal way imaginable. Yet, because of what was deemed to be his mental health issues, he was not sent to prison but instead given a hospital order.

“He is no longer referred to as a killer – he is spoken of as a ‘patient’.

To us, this is deeply wrong. It feels as though the memory of what he did, and the horror our family has endured, are being erased under a label of treatment and care.”

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 94