Featured

British troops handed fresh powers to shoot down aircraft amid growing fears

Defence Secretary John Healey is set to grant British troops new powers to shoot down drones posing a threat to military bases across the UK.

Mr Healey is set to announce the fresh measures on Monday in a bid to shield Britain’s key military bases from the growing threat posed by Russia.


It is hoped the new powers will let troops take more “decisive action” against drone incursions by cutting through the “red tape” that delays military responses.

Four airbases used by American forces on British soil were hit with a wave of mysterious drone sightings last year, prompting the deployment of 60 troops to defend the key military locations.

John Healey

Mr Healey is set to announce the fresh measures on Monday

| PA

The Defence Secretary’s announcement will only hand the powers to troops at military sites, however the Government is “not ruling out working to extend those powers to other import sites like airports”, a source told The Telegraph.

Mr Healey is expected to say: “We will always do what’s needed to keep the British people safe, and as we speak, we are developing new powers – to be put into law through our Armed Forces Bill – to shoot down unidentified drones over UK military sites.”

Current laws only allow British soldiers to use counter-drone equipment to forcibly change their direction, with the option of shooting them down only authorised in exceptional circumstances.

It is currently unknown when the new proposal will come into effect.

Russian drone

Current laws only allow British soldiers to use counter-drone equipment to forcibly change their direction

| GETTY

The move comes amid growing concerns over the threat posed by Russian drones towards European civilian and military infrastructure.

Last month, a number of Russian drones were shot down by the Polish military after aircraft “repeatedly violated” the country’s airspace.

Other mysterious unmanned aircraft, believed to be of Kremlin origin, have been sighted in Norway, Denmark and Germany in recent weeks.

The Defence Secretary is expected to warn of a growing threat of drone incursions from countries hostile towards Britain.

British Royal Air Force Eurofighter Typhoons fighter aircraft fly at RAF Coningsby

Mr Healey confirmed that the RAF would be sending jets to carry out defence missions in Polish airspace

| GETTY

BRITAIN’S ARMED FORCES – READ THE LATEST:

Mr Healey will say during a speech at the Lord Mayor of London’s Defence and Security Lecture: “Last month, we saw 19 drones cross the Polish border.

“Days later, Russian jets violated Estonia’s airspace, while at the same time, Russia mounted a concerted campaign to subvert Moldova’s election.”

He is also expected to warn that the threat exists “here at home”, adding that Britain will “continue to defend ourselves daily from threats reaching from the seabed to cyberspace”.

Last week, the Defence Secretary said that Britain was attempting to “ramp up our response to Russia’s aggression”.

Mr Healey announced a renewal of the UK’s contribution to Nato’s Eastern Sentry mission at meeting in Brussels.

He also confirmed that the RAF would be sending jets to carry out defence missions in Polish airspace until the end of 2025.

In June’s Strategic Defence Review, ministers announced up to £1billion in new funding to boost the UK’s air and missile defences and to launch a new Cyber and Electromagnetic Command to tackle cyber threats.

An additional £4billion is set to be invested into the armed forces’ self-operating technology by 2029.

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 94