Featured

Trans row: Male prison guidance sparks outrage after urging officers to offer ‘makeup’ to trans prisoners

Training guidance in men’s prisons has sparked outrage after urging officers to offer transgender inmates “makeup”, “chest binders” and “appropriate clothing”.

Speaking to GB News, an audience member hit out at the decision and questioned why the “taxpayer is buying lipsticks for male criminals”.


Men’s prisons are being instructed to provide transgender inmates with makeup, clothing, prosthetics as part of a gender affirming support.

The guidance, including voluntary agreements and pronoun use, has sparked criticism from women’s rights groups as “absurd” and “deeply offensive”.

Intel Lady, stock image of prison

Prison training guidance has sparked outrage after urging officers to offer ‘makeup and chest binders’ to trans prisoners

|

GB NEWS / PA

Prison officials stress the items are “purchased by inmates themselves” whilst the transgender prison population continues to rise.

Delivering her verdict on GB News, an audience member told host Josh Howie: “Clearly they shouldn’t be buying wigs or prosthetics and frilly underwear, which they were actually offering to do in Scotland.

“It’s absolutely nonsense. Do they do this for the women and their female estate? No they don’t.”

Echoing the thoughts of the audience member, satirist Intel Lady told GB News: “It’s beyond a joke, isn’t it? It’s just absolutely ridiculous.”

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Prison

Officers and staff were urged to supply ‘appropriate clothing’ and ‘toiletries’, including make-up, for their ‘acquired gender’

| GETTY

Expressing concern for women’s rights in prisons, Intel Lady added: “And where does this sit on the spectrum of women’s rights?

“Because when you’re taking away from women or you’re saying no to women, but all the men can have the women’s products, that’s fine. And if you complain about the men having the women’s products, then you’re a bigot.”

She added: “And in the women’s prisons they’d have to well, they’d have to hope that if they’re allowed, family members are allowed to put some money on their accounts or something.”

Reported by The Telegraph, HM Prison & Probation Service (HMPPS) changed the training session in 2024 to mention the provision of make-up, according to documents obtained by a freedom of information request.

Free Speech Nation

The Free Speech Nation panel discussed the latest move by men’s prisons

|

GB NEWS

As part of the training, officers and staff were urged to supply “appropriate clothing” and “toiletries”, including make-up, for their “acquired gender”.

The training session highlighted the importance of a “signed voluntary agreement” between the prisoner and prison bosses, outlining ongoing support, showering arrangements and boundary-setting for the use of razors.

The training also told prison officers to help transgender inmates to “buy or supply them” with “prosthetics or chest binders”.

A Prison Service spokesman said: “All offenders, regardless of gender, can purchase personal items through the prison shop using their own money and at no cost to the taxpayer.”

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 93