Featured

Labour police chiefs publish pro-migrant ‘fact sheet’ in a bid to ‘promote compassion’ for new arrivals

Three Labour police and crime commissioners have published a pro-migrant “fact sheet” in a bid to “promote compassion” for new arrivals to Britain.

Durham, Northumberland and Cleveland PCCs have teamed up with pro-immigration organisation The North East Migration Partnership (NEMP) to create the leaflet.


The document, which is set to be handed out to libraries and community centres in the areas, claims it dispels “common myths” surrounding the behaviour of migrants in Britain.

The NEMP is funded by the Home Office and Department for Levelling Up, Housing, and Communities.

Migrants

The leaflet features nine ‘myths’ surrounding ‘harmful’ attitudes against migrants

|

GETTY

The groups website claims it “provides support to migrants” and “helps make sure the region can benefit from migration”.

The leaflet features nine “myths” surrounding “harmful” attitudes against migrants, including that the new arrivals are a “drain our public resources”.

It argues that it is “quite the opposite”, adding that migrants contribute more to public finances than the average British citizen.

The document reads: “The Office of Budget Responsibility estimates that the average migrant, who moves to this country at the age of 25 and lives until 80, will contribute £341,000 to public finances over the course of their lives.

“That’s more than a British citizen contributes on average.”

However, the OBR admitted last year that low-paid migrants are a net drain, costing taxpayers £150,000 by the time they reach the state pension age.

The document also indicates there is “no evidence” that “migrants bring crime to our streets”, and even goes on to suggest “there could be a link between waves of immigration and falling crime rates”.

It adds: “In fact, various studies have found that neither asylum seekers nor other types of migrants could be linked to significant changes in violent crime.”

According to court records, asylum seeker hotel occupants have been charged with a total of 435 offences, 109 relating to violence and 44 for sexual offences, including alleged rape.

Migrant hotel London

According to court records, asylum seeker hotel occupants have been charged with a total of 435 offences

| PA

MIGRANT CRISIS – READ THE LATEST: 

The pro-migrant leaflet also claims that “it is just not true” that “all migrants are given preferential access to social housing”.

The police chiefs claim that “migrants are less likely to get social housing than people born in the UK”.

However, almost half (48 per cent) of all of London’s social housing is taken up by foreign-born heads of households.

The documents also goes on to claim that “most” migrants who arrive to Britain “know nothing about welfare benefits before they arrive” and therefore, “they have no expectation that they will receive financial support”.

Police

The police chiefs claim that ‘migrants are less likely to get social housing than people born in the UK’

|

GETTY

Durham Police and Crime Commissioner Joy Allen said: “We know that misinformation fuels fear and can lead to hate crime.

“This initiative is about stopping harmful narratives in their tracks and promoting compassion and truth across our region.”

Northumbria PCC Susan Dungworth said: “Time and time again online and in the media we’re all being fed harmful myths.

“All this incorrect information isn’t just misinforming us, it’s dividing us too.”

“We came together on this project because we all want to set the record straight – replace the fiction with the facts – and hate with understanding.”

Cleveland Police and Crime Commissioner Matt Storey added: “We must do all we can to get the reality of the situation regarding immigration into the public domain and challenge those divisive voices.”

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 103