Featured

Donald Trump’s Secretary of War sparks diplomatic spat after wearing ‘pro-Russian tie’ during Zelensky meeting

Donald Trump’s Secretary of War has sparked a diplomatic row after he appeared to wear a pro-Russian tie during a meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky.

Pete Hegseth wore a white, blue and red striped tie upon meeting with the Ukrainian president at the White House on Friday, sparking theories that he had intended to match the Russian flag.


Russian state-owned news agency Tass said the US official “drew attention” with “a tie in the colours of the Russian tricolour”.

It wrote: “Hegseth’s tie, featuring bold white, blue, and red stripes arranged in the same order as on the Russian national flag, stood out among the otherwise restrained attire of the US delegation.

“While the United States’ own flag includes the same colours, the sequence and design made the choice particularly striking.

“Trump and the other officials opted for plain, solid-coloured ties.”

Kirill Dmitriev, Vladimir Putin’s investment envoy, appeared to draw the same conclusions about Mr Hegseth’s fashion choice, as he shared a photo of his tie captioned with an emoji of the Russian flag.

US Vice-President JD Vance appeared to squash the rumours, posting to X: “Or maybe he was wearing the colours of America.”

Pete Hegseth

Pete Hegseth wore the tie during a meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House last week

|

GETTY

“Maybe it is good that we have the same colours,” Mr Dmitriev replied.

Mr Hegseth accompanied his tie with an American flag pocket square in his navy blue suit jacket.

After speaking with President Zelensky for more than two hours on Friday, Mr Trump implored both Ukraine and Russia to “stop the war immediately”, even if it means Ukraine conceding territory.

“You stop at the battle line, and both sides should go home, go to their families,” the US President said.

JD Vance, Donald Trump Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth

Donald Trump implored Ukraine and Russia to ‘stop the war immediately’

|

REUTERS

“Stop the killing. And that should be it. Stop right now at the battle line. I told that to President Zelensky. I told it to President Putin.”

The two leaders went behind closed doors at the White House, where they discussed a call the previous day between the Russian president and Mr Trump, who has portrayed himself as a mediator between the warring forces.

“I think President Zelenskiy wants it done, and I think President Putin wants it done. Now all they have to do is get along a little bit,” the US President said.

President Zelensky, however, noted how difficult it has been to try to secure a ceasefire, saying “we want this. Putin doesn’t want [it]”.

Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky

President Zelensky described the meeting as productive

|

REUTERS

The Ukrainian leader told the US President that Ukraine has thousands of drones ready for an offensive against Russian targets, but needs American missiles.

Mr Trump later reiterated that he wants the US to hold onto its weaponry.

“We want Tomahawks also. We don’t want to be giving away things that we need to protect our country,” he said.

After the meeting, which President Zelensky described as productive, he said he did not want to talk about long-range missiles, saying the US did not want escalation, and that he was “realistic” about his chance of getting them.

The Ukrainian President, who spoke by phone with European leaders after the meeting, said he was counting on MrTrump to pressure Putin “to stop this war”.

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 97