DEIDiversityDonald TrumpEquityFeaturedInclusionJobsSociety

DEI Industrial Complex in Retreat in Face of Trump’s Crackdown

DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION—The plight of corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion jobs is only getting worse as the Trump administration’s crackdown takes hold, new employment research shows.

As of September, job postings for diversity roles have plunged roughly 50% from pre-pandemic levels, falling to about 1,500 this year, according to Revelio Labs data reported by Bloomberg. By comparison, DEI-related postings nearly quadrupled in 2022, reaching approximately 10,000.

When President Donald Trump took office in January, DEI job postings were about 6% above 2019 levels, according to the outlet.

Since taking office, Trump has led a major effort to eliminate identity-based considerations in employment. He signed an executive order in January directing all federal agencies to “enforce our long-standing civil-rights laws and to combat illegal private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities.”

The Federal Communications Commission has also leveraged merger-approval processes to pressure companies to terminate discriminatory DEI policies. Financial regulators have also scaled back or canceled exams on environmental, social, and governance issues emphasized during the Biden administration, which critics say were used to push liberal priorities on private companies.

In recent months, corporate giants such as T-MobileParamountAmazon, and Walmart have eliminated or cut back DEI policies and departments, aligning with the broader political and regulatory shifts.

Not only are DEI roles disappearing, but individuals with DEI-related experience are increasingly viewed as a liability, prompting many job-seekers to remove the DEI label from résumés or reconsider their career paths, according to Bloomberg.

Some 38% of DEI employees leaving their roles moved into positions within the same company that were not DEI-focused, 55% transitioned to non-DEI roles at new organizations, and a small minority secured new DEI positions elsewhere, according to Revelio Labs.

Still, concerns remain that DEI roles may simply be transferred to other corporate departments, such as human resources.

Among former DEI professionals, 16% have moved into HR operations, 7.9% into education program coordinator roles, 7.1% into public affairs officer positions, and 7% into academic research, Revelio Labs found.

“While the number of dedicated DEI roles is shrinking, the expertise developed in these positions is not being lost. Instead, it is being redirected into other parts of the organization, suggesting that while the DEI label may be fading, the underlying work of building equitable and inclusive environments continues to find new avenues to persist,” Revelio Labs wrote in its September report.

Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 108