FeaturedWorld

Johannesburg shooting: Multiple children dead in horror attack as police swarm scene | World | News

A mass shooting in a suburb of Johannesburg, South Africa, has left at least two dead. Authorities have suggested the incident was linked to gang violence.

SABC News, citing Gauteng police spokesperson Brenda Muridili, said six teenagers were shot and the victims were taken to hospital. Two of them were declared dead at the scene and four have been receiving medical attention.

It is reported the six, aged 14 to 19 years, were shot at by three suspects believed to be members of a rival gang.

Ms Muridili is reported as saying the Provincial Anti-Gang Unit is at the scene with SAPS Forensic Services. She said District Crime Intelligence has also been mobilised to help the Anti-Gang Unit trace the suspects.

Private security firm, Vision Tactical, said its staff have been at the scene. It said initial reports suggest the shooting may be linked to ongoing gang-related violence.

The company initially said seven children were shot and were in critical condition. It said two children died and the emergency services and police were at the scene.

Photos shared on social media show a cordon stretching across a road, yellow markers and officers in high-viz jackets.

A suburb of Johannesburg, Westbury is in South Africa’s Gauteng province in the country’s Highveld inland plateau.

Local media reports the area has been plagued by gang violence, with illegal firearms fuelling turf wars which leave civilians terrified for their lives.

Anti-gang police were pelted with rocks and bottles in Westbury earlier this year as they attempted to arrest a man found in possession of drugs.

The police withdrew, but the attack drew condemnation from the authorities of some members of the local community who were accused of turning on officers trying to combat gang violence on their streets.

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 80