<![CDATA[Donald Trump]]><![CDATA[History]]><![CDATA[Josh Hawley]]><![CDATA[Riots]]><![CDATA[White House]]>Featured

‘Give Me a Break’ – RedState

admin
October 23, 2025
0Points
0
19
‘Give Me a Break’ – RedState

Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) hammered critics of President Trump’s renovation of the East Wing of the White House, suggesting their outrage is selective following race riots in 2020 that led to the removal of numerous statues of historical figures.





CNN correspondent Manu Raju channeled the left’s anger, confronting Hawley about the President supposedly “uprooting” an “iconic building” to create a big, beautiful ballroom.

Without missing a beat, the senator from the “Show Me State” showed Raju why their response is less a legitimate beef and more an example of Trump Derangement Syndrome.

“I hear all of a sudden from my liberal friends that they’re very concerned about our history. Really? These are the same people who tore down every statue they could get their hands on in the last four years,” Hawley offered in his history lesson. “Christopher Columbus, Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt.”

This isn’t ancient history, either. This was just four to five years ago that the destruction of our nation’s history peaked. We all remember the pitchfork mobs going out to every public park and tearing down statues because they felt emboldened to do so. To rewrite history.

READ MORE: Watch – Legacy Media Is All Smiles When Presidents Renovating the WH Are Democrats





Trump Signs EO to Review Statues ‘Improperly’ Removed in Past 5 Years, Restore Truth to American History

Hawley further appropriately dismissed the leftist media’s anger over a story that should have been a footnote in their coverage of the Trump presidency.

“They didn’t have any concern for history then. Now all of a sudden, they’re like, oh, the facade of the East Wing is iconic,” he scoffed. “Oh, give me a break. I mean, give me a break!”

In a separate interview with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham, Hawley again laughed at the manufactured story.

“Now they’re the great defenders of history?” he questioned. “Give me a break. They hate Donald Trump. They hate everything he does.”

Bear in mind that President Trump is renovating the East Wing using his own funds and outside private sponsorships. They don’t even have wasting taxpayer money as a legitimate argument. There is quite literally no legitimate argument to be made here. It’s anger simply because it’s Trump.

As my colleague Becca Lower writes, the left “is all smiles when Presidents renovating the White House are Democrats.”

With that in mind, check out CNN’s coverage (Manu’s outlet) of former President Barack Obama using $376 million in taxpayer dollars to renovate the White House in 2010.





The coverage is decidedly less anger-inducing.

Obama’s demolition project involved overhauling the heating and cooling (HVAC), electrical, and safety systems, as well as retrofitting the Situation Room and excavating space beneath the West Wing. If Trump’s renovations were for the exact same reason, the left would still be having an aneurysm.

Obama also undertook an Oval Office redesign, converted a tennis court into a basketball court in 2009, and established a 1,100-square-foot kitchen garden to promote sustainability initiatives.

As for those statues, President Trump signed an executive order in March directing Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum to review and “restore” any “public monuments, memorials, statues, markers, or similar properties” that may have been improperly removed in the past five-plus years.


Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.





Source link

admin

Related Posts

Featured
9

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

by admin
October 8, 2025

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 77

TRENDING

Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .