<![CDATA[Arkansas]]><![CDATA[Crime]]><![CDATA[Parental Rights]]><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]>Featured

Arkansas Dad Arrested for Killing Young Daughter’s Alleged Rapist Is Now Running for Sheriff – RedState

While this news isn’t exactly “feel-good” material, it does contain a fair amount of poetic justice. Then again, it reminds me of one of those “Dateline” episodes that contain several twists and turns along the way.





Aaron Spencer, an Arkansas father who was charged in the shooting death of his 14-year-old daughter’s alleged rapist in October 2024, is now running for sheriff of the same county in which he was arrested, as first reported by WDBJ7.

Spencer was taken into custody after a desperate search for his missing daughter — whom he found inside a vehicle with 67‑year‑old Michael Fosler. 

According to the Lonoke County Sheriff’s Office, deputies had been looking for the girl when they learned Spencer had already tracked down the pair. Law enforcement authorities said the encounter quickly turned violent, ending in Spencer fatally shooting Fosler. 

According to court documents, Spencer was taken into custody at the scene and later preliminarily charged with second-degree murder and a firearm enhancement for the shooting death of Fosler, who died at the scene. Spencer is expected to appear in court in December for pretrial proceedings.

Meanwhile, Spencer, 37, announced in a Facebook post on Saturday his intentions to run for sheriff — and why:

Hello Lonoke, my name is Aaron Spencer. Many of you know my story. I’m the father who acted to protect his daughter when the system failed.

I refuse to stand by while others face these same failures. This campaign isn’t about me. 

It’s about every parent, every neighbor, every family who deserves to feel safe in their homes and safe in their community. It’s about restoring trust where neighbors know law enforcement is on their side and families know that they will not be left alone in a moment of need.





Every parent’s nightmare, indeed.

    

Spencer remains out on bond as his case proceeds.


SEE ALSO: The Left’s ‘Compassion’ Is a Weapon of Mass Destruction

The Rather Inconvenient Point Daniel Penny’s Critics Leave Out in Their Rush to Condemn His Acquittal


Now, the Same Old Story

Fosler was a registered sex offender facing multiple charges related to sexual crimes against a minor. Earlier in 2024, he was charged with numerous sexual offenses against the Spencer girl. He was out on bond at the time of the incident and had been served with a court order prohibiting contact with the girl. His charges included sexual assault, sexual indecency with a minor, internet stalking of a child, and possession of child pornography, totaling over 40 felony counts.

How many times have we read similar stories? And why was this known predator out on bond?

Here’s more:

Records show that the Lonoke County Sheriff’s Office initially treated the shooting as part of an active criminal investigation, though prosecutors have not yet disclosed whether they will pursue additional charges or modify the existing ones as the case proceeds.

Court filings indicate that Spencer’s defense team intends to argue that the shooting occurred during a highly emotional confrontation and that he acted in defense of his daughter.

If elected, Spencer would assume leadership of the same department that investigated and arrested him. The Lonoke County Sheriff’s Office has not commented on his candidacy or on how it might affect the ongoing case. The election for sheriff is scheduled to take place next year, with filing deadlines expected early in 2025.





Sheriff John Staley said a decision to file formal charges against Aaron Spencer will be made by the Lonoke County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office, according to Law & Crime.


Note: The Schumer Shutdown continues. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown over healthcare for illegals.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership!



Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 73