ChurchillFeaturedHistoryTucker Carlson

“Be ye men of valour”

Although we have taken a timeout from following the most recent conspiracy theories promoted by Tucker Carlson, we have decried his descent into the gutter of rank anti-Semitism. Every writer, every public figure, every publication, and every institution that lauded him in years past is obligated to speak out against the vile figure he has become — deceitful and destructive in his own right and a discredit to everyone with whom he associates.

It hasn’t happened yet. Indeed, on Tuesday, Turning Point USA presented Carlson to a packed house at Indiana University. It’s a time for choosing. If Turning Point USA stands with Carlson, it should be noted and it should be said that it has chosen poorly.

A year ago Carlson invited one Darryl Cooper to present his inverted history of World War II. Carlson cheered him on in the process. Their disparagement of Churchill was a key to the inversion. Carlson and Cooper lie behind the recent Tikvah podcast that seeks to rectify the disparagement of Churchill and also to point the way to the future with the example of Churchill’s judgment and courage.

Tikvah provides this introduction (I have added the links):

Baron Andrew Roberts, historian and author of Churchill: Walking with Destiny, joins Rabbi Meir Soloveichik and Jonathan Silver for an intimate discussion about the revisionist assault on Winston Churchill’s legacy and what that tells us about the state of Western civilization.

They explore pseudo-historian Darryl Cooper’s claim that Churchill was the “chief villain” of World War II—why it’s so wrong, why it’s become popular now, and what it means about the West—which was buttressed by an online poll showing over 40% choosing Churchill as the war’s biggest villain, even over Hitler or Stalin. In addition, Roberts explores Churchill’s early recognition of Nazi evil and his unique relationship with the Jewish people, while Rabbi Soloveichik analyzes Churchill’s famous “Be ye men of valour” speech and its implications for political bravery.

Drawing connections between attacks on Churchill and broader anti-Semitic revisionism, they warn that the assault on great leaders reflects a deeper rejection of Western civilization itself and the very concept of political excellence.

Rabbi Soloveichik, by the way, is the author of the excellent Commentary column “Tucker Screwtape” (October 2024).

As General MacArthur famously said, I shall return! — in my case, return to return to the subject of Tucker Carlson. In the meantime, I want to bring this conversation to the attention of interested readers.

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 78