FeaturedRoyal

Beauty expert delivers telling verdict on Meghan Markle’s makeup | Royal | News

Meghan Markle recently shared a glimpse of her makeup while she was in New York, and now a beauty expert has delivered a telling verdict on it. The Duchess of Sussex spent a few days in New York last week, attending various engagements and meetings with her celebrity friends.

Harry and Meghan were also honoured as humanitarians of the year at Project Healthy Minds’ World Mental Health Day Festival. Following the trip, Meghan shared a new video on her Instagram account, which featured moments from their time in the Big Apple.

In it, Meghan showed rows of expensive clothes and shoes that she wore on the lavish trip, but she also shared a clip of herself applying makeup while sitting on a dressing table in the Sussexes’ hotel room.

Now, the Telegraph’s beauty editor, Sonia Haria, has given her own “forensic analysis” of the Duchess’s choice of makeup.

Ms Haria identified many of the products in Meghan’s blurry shot and said that for foundation, she opted for No Makeup Makeup, which was founded by her friend Victoria Jackson.

She also spotted that the Duchess had a mini version of Charlotte Tilbury’s Airbrush Flawless Setting Spray and claimed it was award-winning for “good reason.”

The beauty expert said, “It sets any makeup beneath it for 16 hours of wear, and it is waterproof, too. While there are many setting sprays on the market, this one is particularly good for leaving a hydrated look on the skin.”

Ms Haria then said that Meghan most likely wore No Makeup Makeup’s Creme Classic Lipstick in shade Pink 02, a “subdued mauve with a pinky undertone,” while the shot featured another one of the brand’s products, its Blush and Lip Color in most likely the shade Peach.

She then spotted Tom Ford’s Shade & Illuminate Contour Duo and Charlotte Tilbury’s Airbrush Flawless Finish Powder.

For brushes, she spotted the Westman Atelier Baby Blender Brush, the Real Techniques Tapered Cheek Make-up Brush. She also identified some pots by Paris Berlin.

The beauty expert then gave her verdict on Meghan Markle‘s beauty products: “It’s an edit of products that certainly won’t appeal to everyone, and indeed, not at the price point that many of them command.

“But there are some items – most likely inspired by her make-up artist – that really will stand the test of time.”

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 80