Featured

Council breached its own equality rules in flag row, watchdog finds

A watchdog has ruled that a Northern Ireland council has broken its own equality rules when it prohibited stall-holders from selling Parachute Regiment flags at an Apprentice Boys parade in Londonderry.

Derry City and Strabane District Council said in 2023 that “due to particular sensitivities”, stall-holders were not allowed to sell emblems of the regiment – some of those solders shot dead 13 people on Bloody Sunday in 1972.


The Quality Commission said the council had not correctly assessed the potential impact of the decision.

However it did not look at the actual policy itself.

The commission also found there were failures in the council’s training, ensuring staff and councillors knew their equality duties and responsibilities under the law.

The policy – opposed by unionists – came after complaints that some stall-holders had sold Parachute Regiment and UVF flags at a parade in 2022.

Many of those flags were seized by the Police Service of Northern Ireland in the Waterside area of the city.

Sinn Féin and the SDLP said the review was aimed at preventing the display or sale of emblems that “could reasonably offend”.

\u200bStall-holders were not allowed to sell Parachute Regiment flags in 2023

Stall-holders were not allowed to sell Parachute Regiment flags in 2023

|

GEOGRAPH

However, Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) councillors and Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) said it was impossible to come up with a policy on offensivness.

They argued that different people were offended by different things.

The move was ultimately adopted by the nationalist-controlled council.

It argued they did not have to screen the changes due to them being “clarification of the associated criteria” on street trading and it was not a full policy change.

\u200bA previous Apprentice Boys parade in Northern Ireland

A previous Apprentice Boys parade in Northern Ireland

|

WIKIMEDIA COMMONS

The commission disagreed.

It found the proper evaluations were not executed and that councillors could not be sure that they were “in a position to full assess the potential impact on equality of opportunity and good relations” when they were making the changes.

Chief Commissioner Geraldine McGahey said there was a “clear message” for all councils that they had to make sure staff and elected members were truly aware of their legal duties and commitments in their equality schemes.

“This report makes clear recommendations for Derry City and Strabane District Council,” she said.

“That all decision-makers including elected members must be provided with information that clearly identifies the potential equality impacts of the policies and decisions they are considering.”

She added that “the council’s training plan” should be regularly reviewed.

Ms McGahey asked for an update on progress in the next six months on how it is implementing the recommendations.

The council said it welcomed the findings.

A spokesman said it acknowledged the findings.

He added the council was “fully committed to implementing the recommendations contained within the report” and it will provide the commission with the requested update.

The council said it remained “dedicated to promoting equality of opportunity and good relations in all of its functions and decisions”.

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 97