Does counting worship attendance still make sense for churches?

Randy knows the strategic spots to get the best views of the sanctuary to count heads. He’s been doing it for years, and I rely on his numbers to know how many people attended our weekend worship services. Barb sends me the complete attendance report on Monday afternoons, which includes more details about children, students, and groups.

Why do I care? Why does my church count everyone each week?

For decades, worship attendance has been the default metric for measuring church success. While some may argue it’s outdated or superficial, the truth is more complex. Let’s start with the sobering reality: Between 70% and 80% of churches in North America are either plateaued or declining. One of the key reasons? Less than 1% of churches maintain an ongoing emphasis on evangelism. Without a clear commitment to reaching new people, growth naturally slows or stalls. So, while attendance isn’t the only measure of health, it remains one of the most revealing.

Get Our Latest News for FREE

Subscribe to get daily/weekly email with the top stories (plus special offers!) from The Christian Post. Be the first to know.

Where did the worship attendance metric come from?

The focus on worship attendance didn’t appear out of nowhere. It grew out of three overlapping waves in church history:

Wave 1: The Sunday school movement (1800s)

Counting became commonplace with Sunday schools. This era emphasized education and attendance tracking. Churches like Illinois Street Church—later Moody Church—under D.L. Moody led the way in gathering and counting large groups. In England, Charles Spurgeon’s Metropolitan Tabernacle also drew thousands.

Sunday school wasn’t just for kids; it was a vital connection point for entire communities. Some churches kept this Sunday school focus up to the turn of the millennium. For example, Guinell Freeman, known as “Miss Sunday School” at First Baptist Church in Jacksonville, Florida, built and grew the Sunday school program to more than 13,000 people by the late 1990s.

Wave 2: The preaching-centered era (early-to-mid 1900s)

In this wave, preaching became the draw. J. Frank Norris and George W. Truett led massive congregations in Texas. Revivalists like Billy Sunday and Aimee Semple McPherson drew crowds through charismatic preaching. Harry Fosdick and Martin Lloyd-Jones were well-known among many different groups. Sunday school remained important, and people like Henrietta Mears continued to implement popular programs. But the pulpit became the central platform for growth. During this era, a major shift began to take place. The front door, or entry point, to the church changed from the Sunday school classroom to the sanctuary.

Wave 3: The church growth movement (1950s–2000s)

With the rise of the Baby Boomers came large churches designed to attract seekers. Robert Schuller’s Crystal Cathedral, Bill Hybels’ Willow Creek, and Rick Warren’s Saddleback Church redefined the church growth model. Strong preaching, engaging programs, and strategic marketing built massive congregations. The church growth movement led to the development of satellite campuses, video venues, and modern expressions of worship designed to attract as many people as possible.

Despite the success stories, many attendance numbers during this era were estimates. For example, until the 1990s, Southern Baptist churches were asked to report only one Sunday’s attendance — for the whole year. And yes, most chose Easter. While more accurate weekly tracking became the norm later, exaggeration wasn’t uncommon. You could argue the hyper-focus on the metric of worship attendance still leads to inflated figures.

Wave 4: The neighborhood church era (post-pandemic)

What’s next? The preference is rising for smaller neighborhood churches closer to home. Before the pandemic, only 10% of churchgoers were willing to drive more than 30 minutes to church. These drive times are likely shorter now. The reach of regional churches is beginning to pull back. People are considering smaller neighborhood churches in their communities.

The competition for attendance growth is beginning to diminish. Average weekly worship attendance is still the metric of success and will likely remain so for the foreseeable future. Churches should grow, but the pressure to be bigger and better than everyone else is fading.

The double-edged sword of worship attendance

Focusing on attendance isn’t inherently good or bad. It depends on how it’s used.

Healthy Uses:

• Rhythms build discipleship. Regular attendance creates patterns that foster spiritual growth.
• Presence enables connection. When people show up, you have the chance to engage, disciple, and shepherd them.
• Trends reveal direction. Attendance is a simple way to spot whether things are improving or declining.
• Opportunities increase. Weekly gatherings are moments for evangelism, ministry, and invitation.

Unhealthy Uses:

• Legalism creeps in. Guilt-driven attendance goals can drain energy and obscure grace.
• Growth becomes a game. It’s tempting to chase numbers instead of people.
• Charisma overshadows calling. When growth relies solely on a dynamic leader, it often collapses when that leader leaves.
• Quantity replaces quality. Sitting in a pew doesn’t guarantee spiritual maturity.

So, how do we hold on to what’s good while avoiding the pitfalls? By focusing not just on growing numbers, but on healthy growth.

Practical steps toward healthy church growth

One way to maintain a healthy focus on attendance figures is to distinguish between lead metrics and lag metrics.

Lead metrics are the controllable actions that drive outcomes — the effort you make. Lag metrics, on the other hand, are the results that appear after the fact, such as attendance, giving, or conversions.

• Lead metric example: number of invites to church your members made.
• Lag metric example: worship attendance on Sunday.

Lead metrics help you focus on what you can do now to move toward your goals. Lag metrics tell you what happened because of your effort. A mistake church leaders can make is celebrating the lag metric (worship attendance) instead of the lead metric (inviting people). Church culture changes when members focus more on lead metrics instead of lag metrics.

Work with the willing.

You don’t need the whole church on board to begin moving forward. Start with a few motivated families. They can change the direction of an entire congregation.

Redefine what success looks like.

The days of rapid transfer growth are fading. Instead of focusing only on how many people show up, pay attention to how many are invited. How many phone calls are made to absent members? Who’s being evangelized, followed up with, or prayed for?

Establish consistent rhythms.

Weekly programming matters. A church with 100 people every Sunday is stronger than one with 500 people once a month. Consistency beats sporadic crowds every time, especially for discipleship and pastoral care.

Engage your community demographically.

Don’t guess who lives nearby — know. Use tools like the Know Your Community Report or the Good News Neighbors Toolkit. Deliver gifts to new residents. Make hospitality your signature trait.

Run a regular check-up.

Evaluate your church’s health honestly. Where are you strong? Where are you stuck? Where do you need to realign or rebuild? Metrics can be helpful here, but only if they lead to actionable outcomes. The Church Health Scorecard is an excellent starting point for identifying which metrics to utilize.

The metric of success

Worship attendance still has value. It remains one of the clearest indicators of momentum in a church. But healthy churches don’t chase attendance. They cultivate community, deepen discipleship, and embrace evangelism. In a world where attention spans are short and cultural Christianity is fading, being physically present for worship matters more than ever.

So yes, attendance still matters. But even more than that, presence matters. Your church can grow when you focus on people, not just numbers. And that growth can begin with one invitation, one conversation, and one Sunday at a time.

Originally published at Church Answers.