BerlinChild PornographyDrag QueenFeaturedGenderGender IdeologyGermanyHomosexualityJurassica ParkaLGBTMario Olszinski

Famous German drag queen faces investigation over child pornography allegations


BERLIN (LifeSiteNews) — German authorities have started an investigation into a famous drag queen from Berlin for the possession and distribution of child pornography.

A spokesperson for the public prosecutor’s office told Berlin newspaper B.Z., “At the beginning of July 2025, Berlin police officers searched the defendant’s home address in Berlin on behalf of the Berlin public prosecutor’s office on suspicion of distributing and possessing child pornography.”

“The background to this was a report made by the US organization NCMEC to the German authorities in connection with the IP address used on the internet,” the spokesperson continued.

The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) is a private nonprofit organization founded in 1984 by the United States Congress.

The drag queen performer, Mario Olszinski, is known under his stage name “Jurassica Parka.” He works as a DJ across Europe and has his own talk show at the BKA Theater in Kreuzberg, Berlin. Guests on his show included leftist politicians and media figures. Parka has frequently been photographed with Berlin’s high society and political elite.

The public prosecutor’s office stressed that the investigation is ongoing and that the presumption of innocence applies.

The case is the latest highprofile example of reported child abuse or exploitation by homosexuals.

Olszinski’s lawyer responded to B.Z.’s inquiry by stating that he would not comment on the preliminary investigation, as no charges have been filed and no verdict has been reached yet.

Olszinski posted a video on Instagram in which he responded to the allegations.

He said, “There is an investigation into an alleged online offense.”

“The investigation is likely to take some time,” he stated, adding that he could not comment further on the matter.

The drag queen performer alluded to an addiction that he suffers from and talked about “Substance abuse, self-destructive tendencies, loss of control.” He said he is undergoing “addiction therapy.”




Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 84