Breaking NewsbreakingnewsChuck SchumerCongressDefenseDefense DepartmentDonald TrumpFeaturedHouse of RepresentativesPoliticsSenate

How the Senate Voted on Bill Funding Paychecks for Troops

On Thursday, the Senate failed to pass bipartisan legislation to fund the Department of War for the next fiscal year, putting military personnel and operations in jeopardy as the government continues to be shut down.

“If anything was needed to demonstrate just how fundamentally uninterested Democrats are in supporting our troopsand defending our countryjust take a look at this vote,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said on the Senate floor after the vote.

With a final vote of 50 to 44, the measure did not meet the 60 votes needed for passage. Three Democrats voted with Republicans to pass the bill: Sens. Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada; Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire and John Fetterman of Pennsylvania.

Sens. Tim Sheehy, R-Mont., wrote on X, “Dems just voted against funding our military even though this was a bipartisan appropriations bill.”

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.V., decried Democrats’ “continued political games.”

Thune had said this week that it was the Democrats’ best interest to back the troops by supporting the GOP legislative measure.

If Democrat senators “want to stop the Defense bill, I don’t think it’s very good optics for them,” Thune explained. 

The legislation titled the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2026 provided federal dollars for military expenditures like personnel, operations, procurement, as well as research and development. The defense bill did not include expenditures for military family housing, military construction, or civil works projects by the Army Corps of Engineers. Still, the bill would be a crucial step for providing for the military as the current government shutdown threatens federal operations.

Thousands of federal workers deemed nonessential have been furloughed because of the government shutdown, which began on Oct. 1. Essential personnel, whether in the Department of War or elsewhere, still come into their workplaces. Federal employees will receive back pay once the shutdown ends. President Donald Trump has sought to pay military personnel despite the shutdown by redirecting $8 billion of unobligated research development testing and evaluation funds from the prior fiscal year.

Thune also expressed a wish that funding for the Department of Labor, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Education would be voted on as well, essentially bringing back miniature funding legislation.

“We would like to do a package. We’d like to do a mini, like we did before,” the Republican leader stated

On Thursday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., had responded to speculation about Democrat support for such an effort.

“Right now, the only thing that is on the floor is just the defense bill. Thune needs unanimous consent to add anything else to it. We don’t even know he’ll get that,” the New York senator said.

“It’s always been unacceptable to Democrats to do the defense bill without other bills that have so many things that are important to the American people, in terms of health care, in terms of housing, in terms of safety,” Schumer added. 

Schumer then said, “So you all know, they need unanimous consent to add something to the defense bill. They don’t have it.”

George Caldwell contributed to this report.

This is a breaking news article and it may be updated.



Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 86