<![CDATA[Civil Rights]]><![CDATA[Los Angeles]]><![CDATA[Title IX]]><![CDATA[Transgender]]>Featured

Image of Trans Swimmer ‘Lia Thomas’ Getting Honored With ‘Inspiration’ Award Pretty Much Says It All – RedState

admin
October 17, 2025
0Points
0
0
Image of Trans Swimmer 'Lia Thomas' Getting Honored With 'Inspiration' Award Pretty Much Says It All – RedState

There’s been slow but sure movement in recent months toward a restoration of sanity when it comes to the subject of (usually) male-identifying transgender athletes taking part in girls’ and women’s sports – not only from the efforts of civil rights warriors like Assistant AG Harmeet Dhillon in the 47 Justice Department, but every day Americans speaking out against what are clearly injustices in action in public school across the country. As RedState has reported, one of the areas with egregious infractions of Title IX is Southern California.





Readers likely remember former University of Pennsylvania swimmer “Lia Thomas,” who was born Will Thomas, and was awarded medals and other opportunities that should have gone to women. Over the summer, some of those wrongs were corrected, as UPenn stripped Thomas of all of the collegiate titles he earned.

READ MORE: DOJ Civil Rights Div. Head Harmeet Dhillon Details Her First 100 Days Fighting DEI

‘Disgusting’: Parents Speak Out About Daughters Having to Compete Against Boys at CA State Championship

Now, several SoCal pro sports organizations just sponsored a farcical award that was given to Thomas by an LGBTQ+ group during the Rainbow Labs “Violet Visionary Awards.” He received their “Voice of Inspiration Award” on Thursday night. Our pals at OutKick were first to report on this, and they deserve our kudos for keeping an eye on the ball (pardon the pun).

At the Rainbow Labs “Violet Visionary Awards,” on Thursday night, Thomas will be presented with the “Voice of Inspiration Award.” Per the event website, this honor is given to “…an individual whose story and actions ignite hope and courage within the LGBTQ+ community.”

…

Prominently mentioned as sponsors of the “Violet Visionary Awards” are two of LA’s biggest sports teams, the Dodgers and LA Football Club. Presumably, they would understand that men have physical strength advantages over women, since neither of their teams or organizations have female athletes playing for them.

…

It’s unclear what precisely Thomas did to “ignite hope and courage.” 





Riley Gaines spoke exclusively with Outkick about the news, and offered some suggestions on that mystery, while questioning the bestowing of the title “voice of inspiration” on someone like Thomas.

“The only people Will Thomas inspires are other men who realized you can take everything from women – our records, our spaces, our opportunities – and still get a standing ovation,” she said. “It’s 2025, not 2020. We’re done pretending that’s courage.”

Another vocal supporter of restoring the rights of women and girls in sports, Jennifer Sey, the founder & CEO of XX-XY Athletics, posted an image from the event, calling it “an absolute joke.”

The striking image pretty much says it all:

And not to be outdone, conservative radio commentator Clay Travis pointed out the obvious:





While we have seen some encouraging and positive changes – whether it’s from American businesses putting aside trying to bow down to activists on the Left, or public schools scaling back on men in women’s’ and girls’ sports – the lingering of the issue continues in some quarters, unfortunately.


Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.





Source link

admin

Related Posts

Featured
9

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

by admin
October 8, 2025

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 80
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .