<![CDATA[Joe Biden]]><![CDATA[Karine Jean-Pierre]]><![CDATA[Media Bias]]>Featured

Karine Jean-Pierre’s Comeback Tour Crashes on the Rocks – RedState

admin
October 20, 2025
0Points
0
1
Karine Jean-Pierre's Comeback Tour Crashes on the Rocks – RedState

Karine Jean-Pierre is on the comeback train, or at least that’s her plan. The former White House press secretary has been largely maringalized over the last year, owing to her unrepentant participation in the cover-up of Joe Biden’s deep mental and physical decline in office. Still, she likely expected a warm welcome after writing a tell-all book, typically an easy cash-grab for former members of a Democrat administration. Instead, she’s getting the cold shoulder from an unexpected source: The left-wing press. 





Speaking to Obama bestie Gayle King on CBS News, Jean-Pierre was pressed on the claim that she didn’t see Biden declining over his distraous four-year term. 

SEE: Karine Jean-Pierre Slams Democrats, and Surprise, She’s Written a Book

You know who else is “always engaged?” Your 90-year-old grandmother at the nursing home. That doesn’t mean they are capable of serving as president. The way Jean-Pierre and other defenders talk about Biden is just hilarious, as if being barely sentient was the baseline. We are talking about the most strenous job in the world, at least mentally speaking. The requirement isn’t for a president to not be drooling on himself. It’s to be alert on a level over and above the average person, and Biden certainly never met that standard. 

And to be sure, I’m being kind. There were times when Biden didn’t even meet the no drooling standard. He appeared to fall asleep during multiple meetings over the years, and there were many times when he seemed completely out of it. That’s not even considering all the times he was awake but ended up having a complete mind melt, forgetting names, mislabeling countries, and slurring his words like he just got off an all-night bender. 





Speaking to Tim Miller of The Bulwark, another left-wing outlet, Jean-Pierre got very defensive when she was told that Biden took far less questions from the press compared to current President Donald Trump. 

To be clear, Biden speaking “to the American people a couple times a week” amounted to him mumbling a one-liner to the press pool as he hobbled to Marine One in his pediatric tennis shoes. There would be weeks-long stretches where he wouldn’t take a single real question from reporters, and official press conferences were exceedingly rare. When then did happen, they were often incredibly short, with Biden calling on a list of pre-selected reporters and sometimes even having the questions given to him on a cheat sheet. 

Of course, no one should confuse any of this combative questioning of Jean-Pierre from the Democrat-loving press as actual journalism. They simply see the former press secretary as complicit in a 2024 election loss they felt could have been different had Biden dropped out sooner. King and the rest truly believe that had Kamala Harris gotten a full cycle at the top of the ticket, she’d have prevailed. That’s, of course, laughable given she only got more unpopular the more she was on the campaign trail, but it’s a delusion they’ll continue to entertain, perhaps until she’s renominated in 2028. To that I say, go right ahead. 







Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.





Source link

admin

Related Posts

Featured
9

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

by admin
October 8, 2025

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 109
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .