FeaturedPolitics

Keir Starmer warned he only has ‘months’ to show he can stop Labour’s collapse | Politics | News

Sir Keir Starmer has been warned he only has “months” to show he can stop Labour‘s collapse. Former Labour leader Lord Kinnock issued the stark warning that the Prime Minister needs to “act quickly”.

It comes as Labour’s poll ratings have plummeted just 15 months after their landslide election win amid the rise of Reform UK, while there have been open questions over Sir Keir’s future. Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour last night, Lord Kinnock said of Sir Keir: “The reality is that he has got to act quickly in order to clearly establish a direction and purpose.

“Now, I know he’s got it. He’s a man of high intelligence and deeply rooted principles. There’s no doubt at all about that.

“But, what he’s got to do is, if you like, demonstrate that he is authentically very Labour with a set of principles that are practical in their application, under determination to put them into full effect.”

Lord Kinnock said that the Government had been making “progressive” moves but added that they were “unheard because they’ve been obscured by basic errors” like the deeply unpopular winter fuel payments cuts.

He went on: “Now that has got to be attended to by effective management by the Prime Minister.

“There’s nobody else to do it. What he’s got to do in the coming months – and I mean months, not over years, is demonstrate that very clearly.”

Lord Kinnock also criticised the Prime Minister’s Downing Street operation.

He said: “I don’t know where the focus is of the people who work in No10, and I think that they’ve got to demonstrate sensitivity to the realities of politics.

“I’ve got reservations about the capability of some of the people who appear to be there.

“I know some of them to be extremely able and effective, and they’ve demonstrated that historically but something is not connecting effectively with the Labour Party or with basic political skills and I hope it will very rapidly.”

A Labour leadership contest would be triggered if 20% of the party’s MPs nominate a willing candidate to stand against the leader.

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 97