FeaturedRoyal

Meghan Markle’s 3-word demand to staff on how to address her | Royal | News

Meghan Markle issued a straightforward three-word directive regarding how she wished to be addressed by an Invictus Games staff member.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex journeyed to Canada last February for the Invictus Games Vancouver Whistler 2025.

Scott Moore was named as the new chief executive of the Invictus Games Vancouver Whistler 2025 last year, charged with supervising the organisation’s first winter competition.

In preparation for the event, Mr Moore disclosed his encounter with the couple, who withdrew from their Royal responsibilities in 2020.

He disclosed that he had enquired about the correct manner to address them, reports the Express US.

According to him, the Duchess responded, “Ma’am is fine” as he previously told the Daily Mail.

Likewise, a simple “Sir” was suitable for addressing the Duke of Sussex.

He told the media outlet in February of the previous year, “I did make sure to ask how I should be addressing them when they get here, and I was told the simple sir and ma’am is fine.”

Usually, male members of the Royal Family are initially addressed as “Your Royal Highness” followed by “Sir,” whilst female members are first called “Your Royal Highness” and subsequently “Ma’am,” reports the Express.

Harry and Meghan have since stopped being working members of the Firm.

Despite this, they retain their full Royal titles, including their HRH styles; however, they have agreed not to use them for commercial purposes following their departure, in line with agreements made with the royals.

This isn’t the first time reports have emerged about how Harry and Meghan prefer to be addressed.

Just a month before this year’s Invictus Games, Vanity Fair published a startling cover story containing various claims about the Sussex duo, including allegations that some of their former employees were required to address them as sir or ma’am, despite their non-working Royal status.

The article stated: “Some people familiar with the production of Archetypes and Harry’s book tour said they were instructed to address the couple as sir or ma’am, though the request was dropped in one instance after the person pushed back. (Other people say they were encouraged by Harry and Meghan to call them by their first names.)”.

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 98