Featured

Nearly 40% of Gen Z women identify as atheist, agnostic, no faith

Attendees raise their hands in worship during Franklin Graham's Route 66
Attendees raise their hands in worship during Franklin Graham’s Route 66 “God Loves You” tour in Springfield, Missoui, on Sept. 23, 2021. | Courtesy of Billy Graham Evangelistic Association

As they grapple with a profound disconnection from their parents and older adults in general, nearly 40% of young adult women in Generation Z — those born between 1999 and 2015 — now identify as religiously unaffiliated, according to new data released by Barna Research.

The data from 2,000 adults and teenagers between the ages of 13 and 24 shows that 38% of Gen Z women (ages 18 to 24) currently identify as atheist, agnostic or say they have no faith at all. This is higher than the 32% of men in the same age group who said they are religiously unaffiliated.

The data was collected in the summer of 2023 and shared in a report published last week. The error margin for this data is 2.1 percentage points. 

While Barna’s recent research has shown promising openness among Gen Z to explore spirituality and faith, including in Jesus, females were found to be the most likely to disengage from church, prayer and belief among young adults and teens.

Young adult Gen Z women reported the lowest rates of Bible reading, church attendance and prayer among their peers, the report said.

In general, some 73% of all Gen Z respondents report that they believe in God or a higher power, and 47% say they believe Jesus is the only way to God. When it comes to Gen Z young adult women, those who say they believe drops significantly.

Only 58% of women 18 to 24 report having prayed within the past week. That is much lower than the 63% of younger teenage girls and more than 70% of teenage boys who said they prayed. Only 31% of young adult women reported reading the Bible over the same period compared to 41% across all other Gen Z groups. Only 30% of them also reported attending church in the last seven days. It was the lowest of any demographic group in the survey.

This level of spiritual disengagement comes as other findings by Barna researchers have shown that Gen Z women are struggling with what they see as a lack of support from the adults in their lives including their parents.

Just 23% of Gen Z young adult women feel supported by their father compared to the 47% of younger teenage girls who feel that support. Only 36% of the cohort also reported feeling support from their mother compared to the 74% of younger teenage girls who feel that way. In general, only 32% of young adult women believe their parents even understand them. Just 33%, said they feel valued by older adults.

According to the report, 40% of Gen Z women agree that “older people don’t seem to understand the pressure my generation is under.”

“If we want to see change in Gen Z women’s spiritual trajectories, relationships are the place to start,” Daniel Copeland, Barna’s vice president of research, said. “Faith is a skill that must be modeled first, and strong, supportive relationships can bridge the gap between doubt and belief.”

Other Barna studies have shown that since the COVID-19 pandemic, men are starting to outpace women in other key spiritual indicators, such as church attendance. As part of its ongoing State of the Church initiative, Barna reported earlier this month that 43% of men reported attending church weekly, compared with 36% of women.

The gap in church attendance between men and women is the largest ever recorded by Barna since they began tracking the trend decades ago, marking a reversal of decades-long trends that saw women outpacing men in church attendance by a wide margin.

Contact: leonardo.blair@christianpost.com Follow Leonardo Blair on Twitter: @leoblair Follow Leonardo Blair on Facebook: LeoBlairChristianPost



Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 80