Featured

Pastor Matthew Queen back in the pulpit

Former Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary evangelism professor Matthew Queen is pastor of Friendly Avenue Baptist Church in Greensboro, North Carolina.
Former Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary evangelism professor Matthew Queen is pastor of Friendly Avenue Baptist Church in Greensboro, North Carolina. | Screengrab/YouTube/Baptist Press

Seven months after receiving a six-month sentence for lying to federal investigators looking into sexual abuse in the Southern Baptist Convention, Matthew Queen is now back in the pulpit as a pastor in Texas.

Church officials were not immediately available for comment when contacted by The Christian Post on Friday, but Queen is now listed as a member of the Plymouth Park Baptist Church’s Pastoral Care Team in Irving.

“Dr. Matt Queen serves as our associate pastor. He is the husband of Hope and the father of two daughters,” Queen’s bio reads on the church’s website in part. “Dr. Queen brings over three decades of experience in a variety of roles and contexts as a leading voice in evangelism.”

In March, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York Lewis Kaplan sentenced Queen to six months of home confinement during which time he was not allowed to leave except to get medical care for himself or his wife or with permission from his probation officer. He was also required to wear an electronic monitor.

Prior to the sentencing, Queen was facing a penalty of up to five years in prison for lying to federal investigators but Kaplan appeared to have been moved by the 59 letters submitted in court and reviewed by The Christian Post from family, friends, former students, and colleagues, testifying to his moral character and the unfortunate circumstances that led him to betray himself and almost made him take his life.

“Dr. Queen recognizes that the Southern Baptist Convention, including SWBTS, has had a history of covering up and minimizing sexual abuse allegations. He opposes such cover-ups and has always supported victims of such abuse,” Queen’s attorney, Sam A. Schmidt, wrote in a March 2 letter to Kaplan just three days before his client was sentenced.

“When the opportunity has arisen, he has acted on behalf of those who were abused. The most recent time was this past fall while on administrative leave from Friendly Avenue Baptist church. A woman told his wife and him about her experience. Both Dr. Queen and his wife explained to the woman how important it was to report the abuse both for herself and the community,” Schmidt added.

Queen’s charges stemmed from a U.S. Department of Justice investigation into “multiple SBC entities” following a Guidepost Solutions report detailing how some leaders mishandled allegations of abuse and mistreated victims of abuse.

Last year, the DOJ decided not to file any charges against the Protestant denomination but did pursue charges against Queen, a former Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary evangelism professor, provost and church pastor, for falsifying records connected to its investigation. 

The case against Queen, 49, was opened following a November 2022 report of alleged sexual abuse committed by a Texas Baptist College student, according to a statement by Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.

Seminary officials later said they helped facilitate the arrest of the student who withdrew from the college. 

Before the sexual abuse allegation in November 2022, the Justice Department issued a grand jury subpoena to the seminary in October 2022, which required the seminary to produce all documents in its possession related to allegations of sexual abuse against anyone employed by or associated with the seminary, among other things.

Investigators said Queen “attempted to interfere with a federal grand jury investigation by creating false notes in an attempt to corroborate his own lies.” He pleaded guilty in October 2024.

Contact: leonardo.blair@christianpost.com Follow Leonardo Blair on Twitter: @leoblair Follow Leonardo Blair on Facebook: LeoBlairChristianPost



Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 83