Fake NewsFeaturedMedia Bias

Reform at CBS News | Power Line

Bari Weiss has fired Claudia Milne, head of standards and practices at CBS News. Milne was reportedly a significant source of CBS’s “woke” orientation. Variety provides an account that is sympathetic to Ms. Milne. It quotes Milne’s farewell memo to her colleagues:

I believe our role as journalists is to hold the powerful to account.

Actually, your role is to report the news. Accurately.

We are here to question and challenge our political leaders on behalf of our audiences, Republican or Democrat, liberal or conservative….

When did you ever question and challenge Barack Obama? Or Joe Biden? Did your reporters ever mention the fact that Biden was patently senile? And far from challenging Kamala Harris during the 2024 presidential campaign, you edited her interview to make her sound far more coherent than she actually was.

…we must interrogate the social media companies that want to control our attention, the businesses that manage our healthcare and the institutions that shape our education system.

How about interrogating the news organizations that try to control our access to the news, manage the flow of information to us consumers, and shape our political opinions? CBS News has been interrogated and found wanting.

The New York Post adds this:

Claudia Milne, who ran the division responsible for the moral, ethical and legal implications of CBS programming, is the first senior executive to leave the network….

The entire concept of a “division responsible for the moral, ethical and legal implications of CBS programming” is misguided or worse. CBS News’s only moral, ethical and legal responsibility is to report the news accurately and fairly. But Milne evidently saw things differently:

As previously reported by The Post, in 2023, Milne and then-news division president Ingrid Ciprian-Matthews banned staffers from using the word “transgender” when reporting on the Nashville shooter.

The decision sparked outrage at the network because police working the case had identified the killer, Audrey Hale, as a transgender woman. Sources said Ciprian-Matthews and Milne spent 15 minutes telling staffers not to report Hale’s identity because it may not be relevant to the shooter’s motive.

Then again, it may be. And there is legitimate controversy over the seeming link between mass shooters and transgenderism.

Milne was also one of the executives who blocked former CBS News correspondent Catherine Herridge from interviewing [Elon] Musk in 2023, The Post has learned. Herridge declined to comment.

Herridge said on X that she’d had the rare opportunity to interview Musk after his high-profile purchase of the social media platform. …

But the interview opportunity landed with a thud, Herridge recounted on X, because Musk wanted to do it live. CBS execs said they would rather pass on the session than hold it live because they were worried about what Musk was going to say, according to the former investigative reporter.

Ha ha ha ha! They didn’t dare interview Elon live because they weren’t sure what he might say. I guess if predictability is your standard, you can only interview Democrats. And you won’t make news, either.

Another surprising moment in which Milne played a part was last year’s criticism of “CBS Mornings” co-host Tony Dokoupil after he grilled author Ta-Nehisi Coates over his one-sided polemic against Israel, which the writer compared to an “apartheid” state.

Milne evidently favored the “apartheid” slur.

Back to Variety for a final note:

More recently, CBS News agreed to only present live interviews on “Face the Nation,” giving up its ability to edit out falsehoods or stonewalling by guests.

It is convenient, if you want to run a partisan “news” show, to be able to edit out a guest’s “falsehoods or stonewalling” without your viewers knowing it. CBS News apparently has been terrified of live interviews, because the interviewee might puncture the network’s liberal narratives.

No doubt getting rid of Claudia Milne was a good move, but it looks as though Bari Weiss has a long way to go to shape up CBS News.

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 80