AfricaBoko HaramChristian persecutionFaithFeaturedFreedomIslamIslamist TerrorismNigerianigerian christiansPersecution Of Christians

Romanian soccer fans unfurl ‘Defend Nigerian Christians’ banner at World Cup qualifier

admin
October 20, 2025
0Points
0
0
Featured Image


BUCHAREST, Romania, (LifeSiteNews) — In a moving display calling international attention to the plight of persecuted Christians in Nigeria, Romanian national soccer team fans unfurled a massive banner reading “DEFEND NIGERIAN CHRISTIANS” during a World Cup qualifying match in Bucharest.

The public display of solidarity comes amid the ongoing, brutal — frequently murderous — attacks by Islamist terrorist groups against Christian communities in the African nation. 

“For many Nigerian Christians, faith is now lived under constant threat. Villages gather to worship in burned-out sanctuaries, pastors preach despite the risk of abduction, and displaced families cling to Scripture in crowded camps,” noted a Catholic commentator on X.  

“This is one of the most dangerous places in the world to follow Jesus – and yet it remains one of the least reported humanitarian crises,” said the Marine veteran, adding:

To my brethren in Nigeria, you aren’t forgotten.

Stay strong and keep the faith

God is with you.

As noted by LifeSiteNews contributor Jonathan Van Maren, Christians in Nigeria had faced sporadic persecution since the 1950s, but since 2000 have seen wave after wave of violence that has essentially become a slow-motion genocide.

Persecution of Christians in Nigeria began to spike after 1999, when 12 northern states adopted Sharia law. The rise of the terrorist group Boko Haram in 2009 marked a dramatic escalation as well. Famously, the group kidnapped hundreds of schoolgirls in 2014; 87 of them are still listed as “missing.”

Recent attacks in the country have seen the abduction and even murder of Catholic priests and seminarians. In a July press release, the Diocese of Auchi in Edo State reported that several gunmen attacked the Immaculate Conception Minor Seminary, killing one security guard and kidnapping three seminarians.

Last week, Sen. Ted Cruz (R–Texas) warned those responsible for tens of thousands of Christian deaths in Nigeria that he will “hold them accountable,” prompting vociferous denials from the Nigerian government.

“Since 2009, over 50,000 Christians in Nigeria have been massacred, and over 18,000 churches and 2,000 Christian schools have been destroyed,” said Cruz on X. “It is the result of decisions made by specific people, in specific places, at specific times—and it says a great deal about who is lashing out now that a light is being shone on these issues.” 

“The United States knows who those people are, and I intend to hold them accountable,” added Cruz. 

Findings published this summer by the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) highlighted many of the state-sponsored attacks on Christians in the country.

The situation in Nigeria has deteriorated so much that the 2025 Global Christian Relief (GCR) Red List report named Nigeria as one of the most dangerous places for Christians in the entire world. The International Society for Civil Liberties and Rule of Law reported in spring 2023 that over 50,000 have been killed in the country for their Christian faith since 2009.

In its 2025 report, the USCIRF urged the U.S. government to designate Nigeria as a “country of particular concern.” It also disappointingly noted that “the Nigerian government remains slow or, at times, appears unwilling to respond to this violence, creating an environment of impunity for the attackers.”




Source link

admin

Related Posts

Featured
9

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

by admin
October 8, 2025

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 102

TRENDING

Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .