Featured

scientists excited by Bronze Age ingots dating back 3000 years discovered in ‘very unusual’ find

A trove of Bronze Age ingots dating back almost 3,000 years has left archaeologists excited by the “very unusual’ find.

The lead pieces were uncovered by a metal detectorist near Dereham in Norfolk between 2019 and 2020.


Despite lead being essential in the casting of bronze, Dr Neil Wilkin, from the British Museum, called the discovery “very unusual”.

This is because there was a spike in people burying their treasures “for reasons puzzling to us today” at the time which the ingots date back to, around 900BC.

The trove found included four axe heads, one woodworking gouge, casting waste, a fragment of a sword blade and three lead ingots.

Dr Wilkin said: “The lead is what people are getting excited about in this particular hoard.”

In the Bronze Age, around 3,000 years ago, metal smiths calculated the optimum recipe for casting bronze.

It included 90 per cent copper, around 10 per cent tin and between one and two per cent lead.

Axe heads

Four axe heads were found in the ‘very unusual’ discovery

|

NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL

The curator for the British Museum’s early Europe (Neolithic and Bronze Age) collections added: “That seems like an insignificant amount of lead, but if you talk to people who do experiments with bronze casting today, they say it makes a big difference to the melting point of bronze and its pourability into complex and intricate moulds.”

Hoards of lead from the this era are very uncommon despite the material’s importance during the time period.

Only one other Bronze Age lead ingot is in the British Museum.

It was excavated by archaeologists at a trading site on the River Thames at Runnymede Bridge, near Egham in Surrey, in the 1980s.

ARCHAEOLOGY BREAKTHROUGHS – READ MORE: 

Lead ingots

The lead ingots were discovered by a metal detectorist in Dereham, Norfolk

|

NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL

Dr Wilkin believed that the site at Dereham was likely also a trading post due to its proximity to the North Sea.

He said: “There’s a lot of evidence that it was quite a specialised craft and the smiths might have been itinerant and might have gone around several different communities creating tools for them.”

The curator emphasised that each object found was important because they “tell us about that particular moment in time”.

For example, the woodworking gouge “is similar to gouges found in carpenter’s wood kits today”, while the sword piece “says something about conflict being an issue at that time”.

Woodworking gouge

A woodworking gouge was among the objects found in the hoard

|

NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL

The hoard is currently going through the treasure process, which includes the reporting, identifying, and valuing of objects of potential treasure under the Treasure Act 1996.

A coroner at a treasure inquest decides if an object is treasure, and whether a museum should be given first refusal over it.

It is understood that the British Museum is interested in acquiring this hoard.

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 100