<![CDATA[Abigail Spanberger]]><![CDATA[Democrat Party]]><![CDATA[Virginia]]>Featured

Spanberger Campaign Admits Taking Cash From the Democrat Party’s Biggest Bogey Man – RedState

admin
October 23, 2025
0Points
0
0
Mind-Bending Exchange at VA Gov. Debate Where Spanberger Refuses to Condemn Murder Fantasist Jones – RedState

We’ve written repeatedly here on the pages of RedState about how Democrat Abigail Spanberger, who’s running against Republican Winsome Earle-Sears to be Virginia’s next governor, has spent most of her campaign spewing platitudes and avoiding answering important questions. I’ve called her “Joe Biden in heels” due to her refusing to come out of her metaphorical basement to let voters know who she really is and what she’s all about. 





Of course, if voters knew what Abigail Spanberger was all about, they might find it hard to vote for her (except for the crazies in Northern Virginia – they’ll happily vote for insanity). Far from being the folksy “just a mom to three daughters,” Spanberger is radically pro-abortion, pro-trans agenda, pro-illegal immigration, pro-DEI, and anti-woman. When she was in Congress, she took gobs of cash from teachers’ unions and advocated keeping kids out of school during COVID. 

READ MORE: New Spanberger Remarks on Jay Jones Text Scandal Just Made Things Worse for Her

Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing: Winsome Earle-Sears Drops Fire Ad Showing No Daylight Between Spanberger, AOC

Oh, and she’s really mad that she has to deal with the Jay Jones death-fantasy texting scandal, which she has handled horribly by refusing to call on him to drop out of the attorney general race. 

And, now, we’re finding out that Spanberger has quietly taken money from AIPAC, the non-profit and PAC with a mission to strengthen the relationship between the United States and Israel. This is a big no-no for Democrats because their side loves to paint AIPAC as the evil “Jewish lobby” that controls Washington, D.C. The far-left faction that currently controls the Democrat Party has demonized AIPAC for years, particularly since the October 7 atrocity, and positioned the party, with a few exceptions like Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) and Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY-15), as being virulently anti-Israel.





Amy Curtis over at our sister site, Townhall, nabbed the exclusive on Spanberger accepting the AIPAC money. A campaign organizer by the name of Fredrica-Maame Ama Deegbe was caught on hidden camera admitting Spanberger took the money, saying it’s a “huge concern” for some Democrat voters and lamenting “nothing will change” if Spanberger wins. Presumably, this means the “From the river to the sea” crowd won’t get their way.

WATCH:

“Yes, she’s taken like AIPAC money,” Deegbe said in the video. “I know that was also a huge concern for some of our voters, too.”

Deegbe then remarked, “Should I not have told you that?” and joked, “Are you wearing a wire?”

There is a large anti-Israel contingent in the Democratic Party base who might find this interesting.

After admitting Spanberger took donations from AIPAC, Degee also noted the campaign is flush with cash.

“She doesn’t need any more money,” Deegbe said. “It would be a crime, honestly, if they gave her more money.”

“No more money. No more money. She has enough,” Deegbe added.

By accepting the money, Spanberger risks running afoul of many of her former colleagues in Congress. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY-14) once said of the organization, “AIPAC endorsed scores of Jan 6th insurrectionists. They are no friend to American democracy. They are one of the more racist and bigoted PACs in Congress as well, who disproportionately target members of color. They are an extremist organization that destabilizes US democracy.”





Just ask Chuck Schumer what happens when you get on AOC’s bad side. 

At this point, the question that should be on the mind of every Virginia voter is this: What else is Abigail Spanberger hiding? It seems like the only thing voters can actually count on from her is that she’ll say and do whatever it takes to get elected — and hope nobody’s paying attention.


Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.





Source link

admin

Related Posts

Featured
9

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

by admin
October 8, 2025

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 81
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .