Featured

‘Such a relief!’ Britons hail free speech festival amid fears of ‘speaking out’ in their own social circles

Britons attending a free speech festival in London have hailed their ability to speak their truth amongst other people keen to debate, declaring it a “relief”.

Speaking to GB News, attendees revealed they fear “speaking out” on matters in their own social circles, through fear of “upsetting” friends or getting a “reaction” over their views.


The twentieth Battle of Ideas festival took place over the weekend in London, covering an enormous range of debates about politics, economics, science and culture.

The festival hosted over 100 live debates on an array of topics, allowing Britons to speak their mind and encounter “respectful disagreement”.

Battle of Ideas Festival

Britons hail free speech festival amid fears of ‘speaking the truth’ in their own social circles

|

GB NEWS

Speaking to those at the festival, one attendee told GB News: “Here you can talk about anything, it’s such a relief. Anywhere else you go you feel like you’re trying to put across ideas or facts that a lot of people are hostile to.

“And so it’s nice to be amongst people that allow you to say things that even if they disagree with them, you’re not going to destroy them and they’re not going to hate you.”

Another young woman attending the event told the People’s Channel that she is returning for a second year in a row after enjoying the atmosphere the first time.

She said: “I was here last year, so it’s my second time back. I had a great time last year, so I’m back for more.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Battle of Ideas Festival

Attendees admitted their fears of speaking out in their own social circles

|

GB NEWS

“I think last year I was just looking for a space to be able to sort of really challenge myself, and in terms of debating different topics that just don’t get talked about. It’s really nice to see there’s so many more young people.”

Admitting she fears speaking on issues in her own social circles, the attendee added: “That’s sort of why I came last year, to meet some more people my age to talk about things.

“There’s things that I can’t talk in my social circles because you never know who might get upset or how they’re going to react or whatever.”

Highlighting the free speech crisis in Britain, another woman at the festival said society must “find a way back” from the “polarisation” we are currently facing.

Battle of Ideas Festival

One attendee praised the festival as an ‘institution’

|

GB NEWS

She explained: “It’s important that we have different ideas, diversity of thought is really important. But people are frightened now to actually speak out and share and share what they think.

“And if you don’t agree, that’s fine, you can agree to disagree, and we’ve got to learn to do that again. We’ve got to find a way back from this polarisation that we found ourselves in, this us and them kind of society that we’ve ended up with.

“And we can see the effects are of that, so we need to somehow pull together to get back to that respectful disagreement, and this is where those debates start.”

Praising the Battle of Ideas festival as an “institution”, another Briton told GB News: “It’s no way an echo chamber, there’s so many different viewpoints, and it’s just a pity you can’t get to everything because there’s so much on.

“But it’s such a great institution, basically. I love it, especially with the online world that we live in, people that only know how to debate online, and having these discussions in person and kind of practicing the skill of debating and even arguing for positions that you don’t necessarily agree with is so important, and it’s a skill that we’re competing against.”

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 94