FeaturedUK

Tesco announces 28,500 Christmas jobs across its UK supermarkets | UK | News

Tesco has announced plans to recruit over 28,500 jobs during the Christmas period to make the festive season easier for its customers. Most of these roles will be based in the supermarket’s Superstores and Extra stores, offering flexible shift options including early mornings, daytime, and evenings. 

The recruitment aims to help manage increased customer demand and ensure smooth service throughout the festive period. The temporary roles at Tesco cover a variety of tasks, including helping customers at checkout, restocking shelves, and preparing online orders for home delivery. The supermarket said it is looking for candidates “who can bring warmth, enthusiasm and a helpful service to every shopping trip”, reports The Grocer.

Ela Golab, Tesco Group people services director said: “We’re excited to be recruiting festive colleagues to help make it a season to remember for our customers.

“No day is ever the same, and festive colleagues will be able to feel the impact they make on every shift, as they send customers home with a smile. What’s more, no experience is necessary – just the right attitude.”

Several major UK retailers have launched large-scale festive recruitment drives to prepare for the busy Christmas season. Earlier this month, Sainsbury’s and Argos began hiring for 19,000 seasonal roles, offering perks like free food during shifts and staff discounts of up to 15% to attract applicants. 

Aldi was one of the first to start its campaign, aiming to fill 4,500 positions across its stores, including roles for assistants, cleaners, and managers to support operations through the holidays and into 2026.

Meanwhile, the John Lewis Partnership kicked off its biggest-ever recruitment effort in September, with 13,700 roles available—3,000 in John Lewis stores, 8,500 in Waitrose branches, and 2,200 in distribution centres and supply chain facilities.

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 98