<![CDATA[Antisemitism]]><![CDATA[Islamic Terrorism]]><![CDATA[New York]]><![CDATA[Zohran Mamdani]]>Featured

The ADL Remains a Complete and Utter Joke – RedState

admin
October 20, 2025
0Points
0
1
The ADL Remains a Complete and Utter Joke – RedState

With Republican and repeat-loser Curtis Sliwa refusing to cut a deal in the New York City mayoral election, Zohran Mamdani has all but sealed the deal. Barring something completely unforeseen, America’s largest city will be controlled by a 34-year-old self-avowed communist who wants to institute price controls, create government-run grocery stores, release even more criminals onto the streets, tax people based on their race, and promote Islamism. 





So yeah, things aren’t looking up there, and as we approach that reality, it’s worth talking about those who not only dropped the ball here, but did so in a way that is simply inexcusable. Enter the Anti-Defemation League (ADL), the supposedly premiere organization combatting antisemitism in the United States. You’d think having a guy who repeatedly refused to denounce “globalizing the intifada” on the ticket would have had them working overtime. After all, the ADL is based in New York City, and the area is home to the largest Jewish population in the country. 

Instead, it took until October 20th, 2025, just two weeks before election day, for the ADL to offer any criticism of Mamdani, and they did so in the most cowardly way possible. 

I won’t post the whole thread because it’s just a rehash of what RedState has already reported, but long story short, Siraj Wahhaj is a true radical who shouldn’t even be in the United States. Mamdani praising him and taking smiling pictures at this mosque would be the equivalent of a politician palling around with an unrepetant Ku Klux Klan leader.





SEE: After Latest Revelations About Zohran Mamdani, New York City Is Thorougly Cooked

I expect this stuff from Mamdani, though. He hasn’t hidden the ball at all. What shouldn’t be expected is for the ADL to be such a joke that they’d go nearly the entire election cycle without taking a stand against Mamdani. And to be clear, even the above thread isn’t doing that. Instead, it ends with a remark that assumes the Islamist mayoral candidate was just mistaken about who Wahhaj is. 

What disgraceful framing from the ADL. Mamdani was not confused about who he was meeting with and offering support to. Wahhaj is well-known in Muslim circles, specifically in New York City. To pretend this was all one big mistake is to let Mamdani completely off the hook, and that’s exactly what the ADL decided to do. 

Let me ask this question: If the ADL can’t be expected to openly oppose an antisemitic Islamist communist running for mayor in their own city, what is the point of the ADL? 

That’s rhetorical at this point because we all know the answer. There is no point to the ADL, at least regarding combatting antisemitism. It’s a far-left organization that exists to serve the interests of the Democratic Party while spending most of its time pretending “white supremacy” is the preeminanent threat, not because it is, but because it feeds their preferred political narratives. Meanwhile, Islamists are gaining power and they can’t even be bothered to mumble a real condemnation. At this point, the ADL ceasing to exist would do more to help Jews. 







Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.





Source link

admin

Related Posts

Featured
9

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

by admin
October 8, 2025

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 107

TRENDING

Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .