Donald TrumpEvergreen TopicsFeaturedInternationalPoliticsPutinRussiaUkraineVolodymyr ZelenskyyWar

Trump Pledges to Make Deal Between Russia and Ukraine

President Donald Trump says he is confident a deal can be reached to end the war between Ukraine and Russia.  

“I think that he wants to make a deal,” Trump said of Russian President Vladimir Putin. “I made eight of them. I’m going to make a ninth,” the president added.  

“But I love solving wars. You know why? I like stopping people from being killed, and I’ve saved millions and millions of lives, and I think we’re going to have success with this war,” Trump said during a meeting Friday with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Sitting across the table from Trump at the White House, Zelenskyy said he thinks there is “momentum to finish Russia’s war against Ukraine” following the ceasefire and hostage deal between Hamas and Israel that the Trump administration led the way in brokering last week.  

“President Trump [has] really showed for the world that he can manage [a] ceasefire in Middle East, and that’s why I hope that he will do this and we will also have such big success for Ukraine,” Zelenskyy said.

“Nobody thought it could be done. That was one nobody thought could be done, and we got it done,” Trump said of the peace deal that has ended fighting between Israel and Hamas.

Trump welcomed Zelenskyy to the White House one day after having a call with Putin that Trump described as “productive.” Trump and Putin plan to hold a second summit in Budapest, Hungary, in the near future aimed at ending the war between Russia and Ukraine.  

While Trump admitted Putin might be aiming to buy himself more time to continue the war against Ukraine, Trump said he’s “been played all my life by the best of them, and I came out really well.”  

“So it’s possible, little time, it’s all right, but I think that I’m pretty good at this stuff,” Trump said. 

The Trump administration has had a hand in ending conflicts between Thailand and Cambodia; Israel and Iran; the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda; India and Pakistan; Egypt and Ethiopia; Serbia and Kosovo; Armenia and Azerbaijan; and most recently, between Israel and Hamas.  

Weapons, including Tomahawk missiles, were expected to play a central role in closed-door conversations between Trump, Zelenskyy, and top leaders at the White House on Friday afternoon.  

“Hopefully we’ll be able to get the war over with without thinking about Tomahawks,” Trump told the press ahead of the closed-door portion of the meeting. Trump did not say the U.S. would not provide Ukraine with Tomahawk missiles, but said the U.S. needs the weaponry in America for U.S. defense purposes as well.  

For Ukraine’s part, Zelenskyy said security guarantees are the most important thing to ensure a safe future for his country.  

“NATO is the best, but weapons are very important,” Zelenskyy said. “Allies on our side is very important, and … for us, bilateral security guarantees between me and President Trump is very important.”  

While it is very unlikely Ukraine will be admitted into NATO, Putin has previously indicated he is open to a peace deal that would include security guarantees for Ukraine, though it is not clear which guarantees the Russian leader would be willing to agree to.  



Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 101