<![CDATA[Donald Trump]]><![CDATA[History]]><![CDATA[White House]]>Featured

Trump Unveils Plans for Massive Monument in DC to Honor Our 250th Birthday, Has Fun With Announcement – RedState

President Donald Trump unveiled plans for a massive monument to be constructed in honor of America’s 250th birthday in Washington, and he made sure to have some fun with the announcement in the classic Trump way we have come to know.





Speaking to donors at a dinner at the White House on Wednesday night, Trump shared the layout and plans for building a giant triumphant arch on the National Mall in Washington, DC.


READ MORE: Trump Unveils the Progress on White House Ballroom and Celebrates With Donors While Democrats Whine

MORE: Trump Perfectly Trolls White House Press Wanting an Upgrade to Briefing Room


Topped with what the president said looked like a winged Lady Liberty and several gold eagles, Trump talked about the arch and how it will mark the 250th anniversary of our country’s founding.

Trump then held up a model of the arch monument for those in the room to see and talked about how he was given three different scaled models for the possible project. He then cracked a joke about his making the choice on which one to go with, and wanted to avoid dwarfing other monuments in the city like the Lincoln Memorial.

“That’s Lady Liberty on top!” Trump said. 





“So, the sizes would be very different,” he added, walking over to a rendering of the project and the different-sized arches.

“So, this would be small, medium, and large. Whichever one would look good. I happen to think the large one. Why are you shocked?” Trump said in a crack, drawing laughter in the room. 


SEE: Karoline Leavitt Reveals Details, Images About Upcoming Grand White House Expansion

Internet Goes Crazy After Bizarre Video Surfaces of WH Window Shenanigans


The news comes following an announcement on X in September from architect Nicolas Leo Charbonneau of Harrison Design about the construction of a possible arch.

The post read.

A proposal for a triumphal arch in DC for #America250, in the traffic circle in front of Arlington National Cemetery. America needs a triumphal arch!

The image of the proposed arch was later shared–with no other information–by President Trump on his Truth Social.

Can we just rename Trump the Energizer Bunny? It was just this week that he was in the Middle East signing the historic Gaza-Israel peace deal, before returning home to honor the late Charlie Kirk, awarding him posthumously with the Presidential Medal of Freedom at a White House ceremony on Tuesday. The very next day, he’s entertaining donors and talking about his next project to make D.C. beautiful with arch models that he somehow had time to supervise.





The man came into office in January, and in addition to all the policy changes he has enacted that have made America better and safer, there’s been a ton of other changes at the White House alone. That includes paying for the construction of not one but two flag poles on the grounds of the White House, which he felt we needed, and the construction of a patio garden in the White House for events, and more.

Lest we overlook the current construction project to build a grand ballroom on the White House grounds. The president has continued on his promise to Make America Great Again, and we love it. Thanks!


Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.





Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 100