FeaturedFederal Budget

Verdict first, trial later | Power Line

From The Hill newspaper,

Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump shutdown layoffs.

They report,

U.S. District Judge Susan Illston, an appointee of former President Clinton, sided with government employee unions in temporarily barring the administration from carrying out the reductions in force (RIFs) that were expected to impact more than 4,000 workers.

At a hearing Wednesday, Illston said before arguments even began that she believed the plaintiffs would ultimately prevail in demonstrating that the administration’s efforts, which appear to be “politically motivated,” are illegal and exceed its authority.

Then why bother having the hearing, when you have already decided? So, the President, the elected head of the executive branch, has no control over executive branch employees.

The lawsuit was brought by government employee unions, which should not exist.

The unions sued just before the shutdown began, contending the Trump administration’s plan to implement permanent firings instead of temporary furloughs with later back pay is unlawful.

Temporary? Think again. Democrats in the U.S. Senate have now voted nine times to prevent the government from reopening. There does not appear to be any event on the horizon which would change that dynamic.

The unions claim that the Administration “misunderstands the law governing shutdowns.” What law? Democrats voted to shut down the government on September 30. The federal government no longer exists. And it’s not clear that it ever will again.

I presume that none of those 4,000 workers were paid today. Call it a furlough, call it a layoff, call it a firing, it’s just semantics. They no longer work for the government. There is no government.

From CNN,

Military pay resumes amid government shutdown as layoffs mount.

They report,

It’s a crucial payday for U.S. service members — and a moment of relief for military families caught up in the ongoing government shutdown.

President Donald Trump confirmed that troops are receiving paychecks after funds were reallocated from the Pentagon’s research and development budget.

“Resumes”? I don’t think military pay ever lapsed. But there must be a limit to the budgetary games that can be played to keep the pay flowing.

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 76