<![CDATA[Parental Rights]]><![CDATA[Sports]]><![CDATA[Title IX]]><![CDATA[Transgender]]>Featured

When Fair Play Becomes a Family Affair – RedState

admin
October 23, 2025
0Points
0
10
When Fair Play Becomes a Family Affair – RedState

Sam Ponder knows the sting of a lopsided game all too well. As a former sideline reporter turned Sunday NFL Countdown host, she spent years dissecting athletic edges under bright lights. Now, living in the shadow of those same spotlights in Manhattan, she’s refereeing a far graver mismatch: her middle school daughter, braced against a boy in a girls’ basketball tournament. The opponent, competing as a girl under New York City’s lax rules, posted up with the kind of dominance that turns a friendly scrimmage into a rout. Ponder’s team lost, as they have before in this urban ritual of reluctant concession. 





Her tweet about it — raw, unfiltered — cuts to the quiet outrage many parents swallow in silence. What rankles Ponder isn’t the boy on the court. Call him a victim — she does — caught in a web spun by well-meaning but misguided adults who whisper that his body betrayed him from birth. No child arrives miscast in their own skin, she insists, a line her family drills into their three kids amid homeschool lessons drawn from the city’s chaotic blackboard.

SEE ALSO: Seriously? CA Gubernatorial Candidate Stumps for Gender Neutral Olympics

Minnesota Girls Robbed of State Championship by Boy on Opposing Team

The real foul lies with the parents cheering from the bleachers, blind to the harm they’re seeding—not just in their son, but in every girl learning to guard her space. It’s a deception that masquerades as kindness, one that erodes the very idea of separate spheres in sports: places where physical parity lets talent, not biology, call the shots. This isn’t abstract policy debate; it’s the thud of sneakers on gym floors, the wince of a daughter outmuscled. 





Ponder’s story echoes louder cases, like Payton McNabb’s 2022 nightmare — a volleyball spike from a trans competitor that shattered her skull, stole her vision, and left partial paralysis in its wake. McNabb’s teammates knew the risk but stayed mute, fearing the backlash. Teams now forfeit rather than field the question, and counties like Nassau wise up with outright bans. Yet in blue strongholds, the script flips: Fairness yields to feelings, and girls pay the price. Ponder’s own arc sharpens the irony. 

ESPN cut her loose last year, a move she ties loosely to her retweet of a swimmer’s tale against Lia Thomas — the kind of mild dissent that once earned nods from network brass but now invites activist ire. She lost millions, she says, for speaking plainly, yet gained freedom from the corporate hamster wheel. No bitterness there, just a clearer view.

Her resolve to stay in New York, that prodigal giant stumbling through its own identity crisis, speaks volumes. Why flee when the fight is here, in the heart of a nation still worth reclaiming? 

Instead, she calls for adult accountability: rules that honor biology’s stubborn facts without discarding empathy. Safeguards exist — separate categories, age thresholds —that could thread this needle. Until then, we’re left with scenes like her daughter’s: promising athletes diminished, not by defeat, but by a system that confuses inclusion with erasure. America’s games were built on level courts, not leveled ambitions. If we can’t protect the girls on the floor, what ground do we hold?







Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.





Source link

admin

Related Posts

Featured
9

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

by admin
October 8, 2025

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 76

TRENDING

Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .