<![CDATA[Crime]]><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]><![CDATA[Letitia James]]><![CDATA[New York]]><![CDATA[Virginia]]>Featured

Who Letitia James Has Living in Alleged Mortgage Fraud House Just Made Her Situation Much Worse – RedState

admin
October 14, 2025
0Points
0
0
Who Letitia James Has Living in Alleged Mortgage Fraud House Just Made Her Situation Much Worse – RedState

With New York Attorney General Letitia James facing federal mortgage fraud charges, a new revelation has added another layer to the story. 

As RedState reported, James, who bragged about weaponizing the justice system against now-President Donald Trump, is accused of lying about a house she bought in Virginia in order to secure a lower interest rate. When she filled out the forms, she attested to it being a second residence, which carries with it owner occupancy requirements and stipulations on how many years must pass before it can be rented. Instead, she immediately rented it out, a move that would have changed the terms of the loan, leading to a higher interest rate, had she not allegedly falsified the application.





RELATED: Letitia James Has Been Indicted 

So who is living in it? If you only read The New York Times, you’d think it’s just a “grandniece who needed tranquillity,” but according to a new report, that grandniece is actually a fugitive from justice, wanted in the State of North Carolina on some rather serious charges. 

Is the attorney general of New York, who is currently facing federal criminal charges, harboring a fugitive in the house she allegedly obtained through mortgage fraud? Because it sure seems like that’s what’s happening here, and the fact that this is a family member and not some random person makes it so much worse. 

Are we to believe that James didn’t know about her grandniece’s criminal history or that she’s wanted in North Carolina? That’s also something that would have come up on a background check, which James presumably didn’t do since she allegedly violated the terms of her mortgage to rent the house to a relative. That’s what the Times describes as the attorney general trying to provide “tranquility.” You can’t make this stuff up. Real life is too absurd. 





You simply can’t fathom how corrupt so many politicians are, and James has never hidden the ball. She came to power pledging to use her office to take down Trump in what was an obvious attempt to pump herself up to run for governor one day. She’s made a mockery of the justice system in the process, proclaiming no one is above the law while clearly believing she is above the law. 

Shameless doesn’t begin to cover it. I’m still highly skeptical that a Norfolk, VA, jury will ever convict her, given the area’s political leanings, but the attempt should obviously still be made. It’s also worth remembering that the house in Virginia is just one of several alleged instances where James is accused of mortgage fraud over the decades. She also allegedly misrepresented the number of units in a rental property to garner a lower interest rate, and she allegedly claimed her father as her husband on a mortgage. 





I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest that maybe James is just a crook? 


Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.





Source link

admin

Related Posts

Featured
9

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

by admin
October 8, 2025

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 74

TRENDING

Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .
Copyright © 2025 conservdailyusa - .