Featured

Why refugee resettlement for persecuted is in US interest

Armenian refugees from Nagorno-Karabakh are seen in the center of the town of Goris on October 1, 2023, before being evacuated in various Armenian cities. 
Armenian refugees from Nagorno-Karabakh are seen in the center of the town of Goris on October 1, 2023, before being evacuated in various Armenian cities.  | DIEGO HERRERA CARCEDO/AFP via Getty Images

“From London to Lima, from Rome to Athens, from Paris to Seoul, from Cairo to Tokyo, and Amsterdam to right here in New York City, we stand on the shoulders of the leaders … who won and built our beloved nations, all of our nations, with their own courage, strength, spirit and skill.” President Trump concluded his recent address to the assembly of the United Nations with this stirring invocation of the common responsibility of each leader in the room: Protecting and stewarding the legacies of their respective nation.

Stewardship of the United States, President Trump argues, requires strong protection of borders. It also requires an adherence to America’s founding principles: free speech, free expression and the protection of religious liberty — including for Christians.

Persecution is a legitimate and concerning threat to Christians in many parts of the world. The president accurately asserted that Christianity, in aggregate globally, is the most persecuted religion globally. In his first administration, President Trump was notable as the first president since the inception of the U.S. resettlement program to specifically carve out protections for those fleeing religious persecution around the world. As the president and CEO of World Relief, a global Christian humanitarian organization that has for decades partnered with both local churches and the U.S. government to resettle refugees, I’ve had a front-row seat to the importance of programs like this to offer safe harbor for believers, along with those persecuted for other reasons under the law.

In the same breath, he highlighted the challenges facing Christians; our president rebuked other nations for allowing unchecked immigration. While maintaining simultaneous commitments to safety, due process and appropriate hospitality is certainly challenging, nations must create robust, functional immigration systems that allow expression of the biblical mandate to welcome immigrants, including those persecuted for their faith.

Uncontrolled borders present a security threat and mock the rule of law. But the refugee resettlement program is just the opposite: it’s a legal form of immigration established by Congress decades ago that is specifically for individuals who can prove they have fled a well-founded fear of persecution for specific reasons, including religious beliefs. The Heritage Foundation concludes that “refugees undergo more vetting than any other immigrants to the U.S.” The U.S. cannot meet the needs of millions of refugees, but it can certainly offer safe harbor for some of the most vulnerable, including those persecuted for their faith abroad. In fact, doing so is a part of our legacy as Americans: last year alone, the U.S. welcomed nearly 30,000 Christian refugees from the 50 countries where Open Doors says Christians face the most severe persecution. But almost zero persecuted Christians have been resettled since the refugee program was temporarily suspended in January.

Earlier this year, an Evangelical call for the continuation of the refugee resettlement program garnered tens of thousands of signatures, including from many prominent Evangelical pastors. Seven in ten Evangelicals affirm in recent polling that the U.S. has a moral responsibility to receive refugees. And in May, leaders from Focus on the Family, the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, Family Research Council and others joined World Relief in petitioning the administration to continue our long national legacy of refugee resettlement, which they declared among “the most essential tools the United States has historically used to uphold religious freedom,” including hundreds of thousands of Christians, but also Jews, Yazidis and various others persecuted for their faith.

In the coming days, the annual Presidential Determination for Refugee Admission is anticipated. It represents an opportunity to reinstate protections for refugees who have fled their homelands due to persecution. I call on President Trump to reopen that door, including and especially for Christians and others facing religious persecution.

The ideals our immigrant ancestors aspired to are worthy and weighty. What better way to honor and steward our heritage than to bless others just as we have been blessed? Let’s extend their legacy and give persecuted believers the opportunity to worship and live in peace.

Myal Greene is the president and CEO of World Relief.

Source link

Related Posts

On April 12, 2021, a Knoxville police officer shot and killed an African American male student in a bathroom at Austin-East High School. The incident caused social unrest, and community members began demanding transparency about the shooting, including the release of the officer’s body camera video. On the evening of April 19, 2021, the Defendant and a group of protestors entered the Knoxville City-County Building during a Knox County Commission meeting. The Defendant activated the siren on a bullhorn and spoke through the bullhorn to demand release of the video. Uniformed police officers quickly escorted her and six other individuals out of the building and arrested them for disrupting the meeting. The court upheld defendants’ conviction for “disrupting a lawful meeting,” defined as “with the intent to prevent [a] gathering, … substantially obstruct[ing] or interfere[ing] with the meeting, procession, or gathering by physical action or verbal utterance.” Taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence shows that the Defendant posted on Facebook the day before the meeting and the day of the meeting that the protestors were going to “shut down” the meeting. During the meeting, the Defendant used a bullhorn to activate a siren for approximately twenty seconds. Witnesses at trial described the siren as “loud,” “high-pitched,” and “alarming.” Commissioner Jay called for “Officers,” and the Defendant stated through the bullhorn, “Knox County Commission, your meeting is over.” Commissioner Jay tried to bring the meeting back into order by banging his gavel, but the Defendant continued speaking through the bullhorn. Even when officers grabbed her and began escorting her out of the Large Assembly Room, she continued to disrupt the meeting by yelling for the officers to take their hands off her and by repeatedly calling them “murderers.” Commissioner Jay called a ten-minute recess during the incident, telling the jury that it was “virtually impossible” to continue the meeting during the Defendant’s disruption. The Defendant herself testified that the purpose of attending the meeting was to disrupt the Commission’s agenda and to force the Commission to prioritize its discussion on the school shooting. Although the duration of the disruption was about ninety seconds, the jury was able to view multiple videos of the incident and concluded that the Defendant substantially obstructed or interfered with the meeting. The evidence is sufficient to support the Defendant’s conviction. Defendant also claimed the statute was “unconstitutionally vague as applied to her because the statute does not state that it includes government meetings,” but the appellate court concluded that she had waived the argument by not raising it adequately below. Sean F. McDermott, Molly T. Martin, and Franklin Ammons, Assistant District Attorneys General, represent the state.

From State v. Every, decided by the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals…

1 of 77